Background Human immunodeficiency virus type-1 reverse transcriptase (HIV-1 RT) is a product of the gag-pol polyprotein precursor, which is subsequently cleaved by the pol -encoded protease to yield the active form of the enzyme [ 1 2 ] . This multifunctional enzyme is responsible for copying the single stranded viral RNA genome into double stranded proviral DNA [ 3 4 ] . HIV-1 RT is a heterodimer consisting of a 66 and 51 kDa polypeptide chain designated as p66 and p51, respectively. The p51 subunit is generated via endoproteolytic cleavage of the p66 subunit between Phe 440 and Tyr 441 [ 5 6 ] . The larger subunit (p66) contains both polymerase and RNase H activities, while the smaller subunit (p51) lacks these functions, in context of the heterodimer [ 7 8 ] . However, both the p66 and p51 monomers are functionally inactive when dissociated from each other [ 9 ] . Several years have passed since it was first suggested that agents that could specifically disrupt the dimerization of HIV-1 RT might prove a worthwhile antiretroviral strategy [ 10 ] , though such agents have yet to be developed. Despite the fact that p51 shares an identical amino acid sequence with the N-terminal portion of p66, the two subunits assume different global folding patterns in the formation of the asymmetric heterodimer [ 9 ] . Structural determination through X-ray crystallography has revealed that the p66 subunit of HIV-1RT has its polymerase domain in an "open" conformation, with its subdomains forming a large cleft which accommodates DNA. In contrast, the p51 subunit assumes a compact folded conformation that causes the active site residues in this subunit to be buried and therefore, nonfunctional [ 11 12 13 ] . It has been proposed that the open conformation of p66 is supported by interactions with a closed and compact p51 molecule [ 12 14 15 ] . The two subunits interact mainly via their connection subdomains. Additional contacts, between the thumb subdomain of p51 and RNase H subdomain of p66 are also substantial [ 11 12 ] . Although there have been conflicting reports regarding the DNA polymerase activity of recombinant preparations of the p51 homodimer [ 16 17 ] , it has become clear that p51 mainly plays a supportive role in context of the p66/p51 heterodimer. Assembly of chimeric heterodimers formed by mixing subunits of HIV-1 RT and FIV-1 RT, has demonstrated that the p51 subunit of HIV-1 RT helps to preserve the functional integrity of the HIV-1 RT heterodimer [ 18 ] . Despite the fact that several functions have been proposed for the p51 subunit, the mechanism whereby p51 performs these functions has remained largely undefined. Some of the proposed functions for p51 include: (i) stabilizing the t-RNA primer binding for the initiation of reverse transcription [ 11 ] , (ii) enhancement of strand displacement DNA synthesis [ 19 20 ] , and (iii) as a processivity factor in DNA synthesis [ 21 ] . Cys→Ser mutation at position 280 in the p51 subunit has been shown to alter the RNase H activity of the heterodimeric enzyme, indicating that this residue in the thumb subdomain of p51 plays an important role in support of the RNase H activity of p66 [ 22 ] . The emergence of a strain of HIV-1 resistant to the non-nucleoside RT inhibitor TSAO (Tertbutyldimethyl silyspiro amino oxathioledioside) displaying Glu→Lys mutation at position 138 in the p51 subunit of HIV-1 RT has also been reported [ 23 ] , thus implicating p51 to play a more direct role in drug binding and/or the enzymatic activities of HIV-1RT. This report was initially surprising, since Glu138 of p51 was thought to be quite distant from the purported dNTP-binding pocket of HIV-1RT, as well as the NNRTI binding pocket. However, in light of our recent findings implicating this loop region of p51 as a critical structural element supporting the catalytic functions of p66, it seems feasible that mutation at position 138 in p51 effectively altered the binding of TSAO through its influence on the p66 catalytic subunit [ 14 ] . Examination of the crystal structure of HIV-1 RT reveals the presence of a small groove like region on the floor of the polymerase cleft of p66 [ 11 ] . The β7-β8 loop of p51, comprising of six amino acids denoted as SINNET appears to fit into this groove-like region and likely stabilizes the polymerase domain of p66. In an earlier communication, we have shown that the p51 subunit of HIV-1 RT is required to load the p66 subunit on to the template primer for DNA synthesis [ 14 ] . Our recent studies indicate that the β7-β8 loop of the p51 subunit is essential for the catalytic function of the p66 subunit. Deletion of this loop or substitution of four amino acid residues with alanine within the β7-β8 loop of p51 severely impaired the DNA polymerase activity of the enzyme as a consequence of the inability of the enzyme to form stable dimers [ 15 ] . These findings clearly establish the absolute requirement of the β7-β8 loop of p51 for RT dimerization. Nonetheless, the question regarding the optimal size and composition requirement of this loop for efficient dimerization remains unanswered. In the present article, we have addressed the impact of increasing the size of the β7-β8 loop on the dimerization process. As a preamble to these studies, we have increased the size of this loop by repeating its six amino acid sequence in tandem. The rationale for duplicating the loop sequence was to increase the size of this loop without significantly disrupting the interactions seen with the wild type β7-β8 loop. The resulting mutant derivatives of HIV-1 RT containing insertion of six amino acids in the β7-β8 loop in either or both the subunits were analyzed for their ability to form stable dimers and other biochemical characteristics. In this article, we present evidence that HIV-1 RT mutants, carrying insertion of six amino acids in the β7-β8 loop specifically in the second subunit, do not form stable dimers. This inability to dimerize substantially decreases the enzymes affinity for DNA consequently impairing its polymerase and RNase H activities. Results Glycerol gradient ultra-centrifugation analysis The ability of the HIV-1 RT mutants, carrying insertion of six residues in the β7-β8 loop in either one or both the subunits was analyzed by glycerol gradient sedimentation analysis. Fractions of 200 μL were collected from the bottom of the tube and aliquots of every third fraction were subjected to SDS PAGE. The results shown in Figure 1A, indicate that the sedimentation peak for the wild type p66/p66 homodimer was between fractions 16-19 of the gradient (Panel A), whereas the wild type p51 species sedimented between fractions 22-28, as a monomeric protein (Panel C). The sedimentation pattern for the p66 WT/p51 INSmutant indicated two distinct peaks. While the p66 WTsubunit predominantly sedimented in between fractions 16-19, at the predicted position of the homodimer, the p51 INSsubunit sedimented between fractions 22-28, indicating a monomeric conformation (Panel D). This sedimentation profile indicates that the p66 WT/p51 INSmutant carrying the 6 amino acid insertion in the β7-β8 loop of its p51 subunit is unable to form stable heterodimer. Under these conditions, the p66 WTsubunit of the p66 WT/p51 INSmutant tends to homodimerize. The mutants, p66 INS/p66 INS(Panel B) and p66 INS/p51 INS(Panel F), exhibited a distinct sedimentation peak between fractions 22-28 of the gradient, indicating that these enzymes are unable to form stable dimers. In contrast, the p66 INS/p51 WTmutant (Panel E), in which only the p66 subunit carried an insertion in the β7-β8 loop sedimented between fractions 16-19 of the gradient, indicating that these two subunits can form stable heterodimers. These analyses imply that the proper size of the β7-β8 loop in the second subunit of HIV-1 RT is important for the formation of a stable dimeric enzyme. In order to correlate the sedimentation profile of these insertion mutants with their functional activity, we analyzed the polymerase activity in the various gradient fractions. These results are presented in Fig. 1B. The polymerase activity profile of the gradient fractions of the wild-type p66/p66 and the p66 INS/p51 WTmutant revealed major polymerase activity peaks corresponding to fractions 16-19 (Fig. 1B). This activity peak correlates with the protein band intensity seen in Fig. 1A(panels A and E) and is also in agreement with the sedimentation pattern of these two enzymes. Interestingly, the activity profile of the p66 WT/p51 INSmutant also yielded a peak corresponding to gradient fractions 16-19 (Fig. 1B), thus substantiating our contention that the p66 WTsubunit of the p66 WT/p51 INSmutant tends to self-dimerize and form the catalytically active p66 homodimer. The wild type p51 and the two mutants, p66 INS/p66 INSand p66 INS/p51 INS, the sedimentation profile of which indicated a monomeric conformation (Fig. 1A) were conspicuously devoid of any polymerase activity (Fig. 1B). These results imply that the β7-β8 loop of the second subunit of HIV-1 RT is critical in forming functionally active dimeric enzyme. DNA polymerase activities of wild type HIV-1 RT and its insertion mutants DNA polymerase activity of the wild type HIV-1 RT and its mutant derivatives were quantitatively determined on both heteropolymeric RNA (U5-PBS RNA) and DNA (49-mer) templates, primed with 32P labeled 17-mer PBS primer. As documented in Table 1, insertion of the six amino acid segment in both the subunits (p66 INS/p66 INSor p66 INS/p51 INS), resulted in significant loss of polymerase activity corresponding to greater than 90% reduction. Interestingly, when the p66 INSmutant was dimerized with the wild type p51 (p66 INS/p51 WT), the polymerase activity was restored to wild type levels. The same result was obtained when p66 INSwas dimerized with p51 having Asp→Ala mutation at amino acid position 186 (one of the catalytically crucial carboxylate triad) but having an intact β7-β8 loop. The rationale for using p51 D186Amutant was to ascertain that the wild type polymerase activity observed with p66 INS/p51 WTwas not due to residual polymerase activity of p51. These results suggest that insertion of six residues in the β7-β8 loop of p51 but not in p66 is detrimental to the function of the heterodimeric enzyme. As shown in figure 2, evaluation of the polymerase activity of the wild type HIV-1RT and its insertion mutants by primer extension assay generally mirrored the results observed in the TCA precipitation assay, summarized in Table 1. Insertion of six amino acid residues in the β7-β8 loops of both the subunits (p66 INS/p66 INSor p66 INS/p51 INS) resulted in significant impairment of polymerase activity of the mutant enzymes. On an RNA template, both these enzymes exhibited total lack of polymerase activity (Fig. 2B), though the p66 INS/p51 INSmutant exhibited residual primer extension capability on a DNA template (Fig. 2A), while the p66 INSp/66 INSmutant was inactive on this template. Consistent with the results of the TCA precipitation assay, both the mutants, p66 INS/p51 WTand p66 INS/p51 D186A, exhibited near wild type (p66 WT/p51 WT) polymerase activity on both RNA and DNA templates. Thus, the impairment of the polymerase activity seen with these mutants carrying insertion in either both the subunits or specifically in the second subunit may be related to the inability of these mutants to form stable dimers resulting in a closed polymerase cleft. Effect of insertion in either or both the subunits of HIV-1 RT on the DNA binding function of the enzyme Earlier we have shown that substitution of four amino acids on the β7-β8 loop with alanine reduced the DNA binding ability of the enzyme. Similar results were obtained when four amino acids were deleted from the loop. We therefore, concluded that the effect was exerted via p51 since alanine substitution or deletion specifically in the p66 subunit had no effect on DNA binding and polymerase activity of the enzyme. We speculated that alanine substitution or deletion in the loop of the p51 subunit may shorten the interacting sphere of the loop which may not be able to induce opening of the polymerase cleft in p66, which is essential for DNA binding. Given the fact that shortening of this loop in p51 prevented DNA binding, we were interested in examining the effect of six amino acids insertion on DNA binding. Therefore, we determined the equilibrium dissociation constants (K d ) of E-TP binary complexes for the wild type enzyme and its mutant derivatives by gel mobility shift assay. For this purpose, we used a 33-mer heteropolymeric DNA template primed with 5' 32P-labeled 21-mer DNA. Results shown in figure 3and table 2indicate a 24-fold reduction in DNA binding affinity when both the subunits carried insertion (p66 INS/p51 INS) in their β7-β8 loops. Similar results were obtained with the p66 INS/p66 INSmutant. Interestingly, the DNA binding affinity was restored to the wild type levels, when the mutant p66 subunit was dimerized with the wild type p51 (p66 INS/p51 WT). We expected that the p66 WT/p51 INSmutant would also exhibit reduction in its affinity for DNA, since insertion of six residues in the p51 subunit was speculated to be detrimental for the dimerization process. However, the DNA binding affinity of the p66 WT/p51 INSmutant was similar to the wild type enzyme. Our glycerol gradient sedimentation analysis had revealed that the p66 WT/p51 INSmutant does not form stable dimers, rather the p66 WTsubunit tends to self dimerize. Thus, the wild type DNA binding affinity seen in case of the p66 WT/p51 INSmutant may be attributed to the presence of these p66 WT/p66 WThomodimeric species. Based on our observations from the sedimentation analysis, we propose that the loss of DNA binding function in case of the HIV-1RT insertion mutants results from a failure to form stable dimers. The wild type p51 alone exhibited very low DNA binding affinity with a K d[DNA] 1300-fold higher than the wild type heterodimeric enzyme. These results suggest that the optimal size of the β7-β8 loop in the second subunit of the HIV-1 RT dimer is crucial for opening the polymerase cleft of the p66 subunit. Ternary complex formation by the wild type and mutant enzymes In the crystal structures of the ternary complex of HIV-1 RT (E-DNA-dNTP) the finger subdomain moves by 20Å towards the palm subdomain [ 24 ] . In this finger closing conformation, the DNA is locked in a stable ternary complex poised for catalysis. An in vitro assay using dideoxy terminated primer annealed with the template which allows the next correct dNTP to bind in the ternary complex without actual DNA synthesis has recently been reported [ 25 ] . Using this assay system, we have evaluated the ability of the insertion mutants to form the ternary complexes and the effect of DNA trap on such complexes. Since binding of dNTP to the enzyme is an ordered mechanism which occurs only after DNA binding, the extent of labeled TP remaining bound to the enzyme in the presence of dNTP and DNA trap represents the extent of ternary complex formed. The E-TP binary complex was formed at enzyme concentrations which binds 100% of the labeled template primer. The preformed E-TP complex was then incubated in the presence of next correct dNTP followed by addition of 300-fold molar excess of unlabeled TP as the DNA trap. We found that E-TP binary complex was completely competed out by the DNA trap (data not shown) while a significant amount of the E-TP binary complex converted to E-TP-dNTP ternary complex was resistant to competition with DNA trap (Fig. 4) suggesting the stability of the ternary complex. Table 2lists the apparent dNTP binding affinity for the WT enzyme and its insertion mutants determined from data shown in Fig. 4. It was observed that although the DNA binding affinity was severely affected in case of the p66 INS/p51 INSmutant, its apparent dNTP binding affinity in the ternary complex did not change with respect to the wild type enzyme. However, the p66 INS/p66 INSmutant was unable to form a ternary complex. These data suggest that these two mutants may have a different conformation and mode of interaction in the ternary complex. It is apparent that the p66 INS/p66 INSbinds to TP in a nonproductive manner which may have a direct impact on dNTP binding in the ternary complex. Steady state kinetic analysis of HIV-1 RT and its insertion mutants In order to determine whether alteration in DNA binding without any change in the apparent dNTP binding affinity of the insertion mutants is consistent with their kinetic parameters, we analyzed the steady-state kinetic parameters of these mutants. The results of this investigation are summarized in Table 3. On poly (rA).(dT) 18 , only the p66 INS/p66 INSmutant showed a significant increase in K m [dNTP] . This observation is in agreement with the apparent dNTP binding affinity data in the ternary complex, where p66 INS/p66 INSmutant was found to be defective in forming a productive ternary complex. This observation is also consistent with our suggestion that p66 INS/p66 INSbinds nonproductively to TP that may influence the formation of ternary complexes. Interestingly, the p66 INS/p51 INSmutant carrying insertion in both the subunits did not display the same reduction in dTTP binding affinity. However, the p66 INS/p66 INSand p66 INS/p51 INSmutants displayed nearly 6,000-fold and 400-fold reduction in catalytic efficiency (k cat /Km) compared to their wild type counterparts, respectively, on this template primer. A 10-fold reduction in catalytic efficiency in case of the p66 INS/p51 WTwas noted only on poly (rA). (dT) 18 and may be template-primer specific. None of the enzymes displayed a significant reduction in K m [dNTP] when the heteropolymeric DNA\DNA template primer was used, although the p66 INS/p66 INSand p66 INS/p51 INSmutants exhibited drastic reduction in catalytic efficiency. The p66 WT/p51 INSdisplayed no change in either dNTP binding or catalytic efficiency. These results are in keeping with our analysis of the polymerase and DNA binding assay for this mutant. Once again, we believe that the wild type p66 subunit in this enzyme preparation tends to homodimerize since the p51 INSfails to participate in stable dimer formation. This phenomenon masks the deleterious effect of the insertion mutation. RNase H activity of the insertion mutants Since the polymerase activity of the homo- and hetero-dimeric enzymes carrying insertion in the β7-β8 loop in both the subunits (p66 INS/p66 INSand p66 INS/p51 INS) was drastically impaired, it was of interest to examine how this insertion affects their RNase H activity. To evaluate this, we employed a 30-mer RNA-DNA hybrid, and examined the cleavage of the 5'- 32P-RNA strand of the duplex by the wild type enzyme and its mutant derivatives. The result of this analysis is presented in Fig. 5. Similar to their polymerase activities, the RNase H activities of the p66 INS/p66 INSand p66 INS/p51 INSmutants were severely impaired. This is not surprising, since our analysis of the DNA binding function of these two mutants had indicated a substantial loss of DNA binding affinity, which in turn is expected to affect both the polymerase and RNase H functions. Dimerization of the p66 INSsubunit with the wild type p51 (p66 INS/p51 WT) carrying an intact β7-β8 loop resulted in substantial recovery of the RNase H activity. The RNase H activity seen in case of the p66 WT/p51 INSmutant was not surprising since the p66 WTsubunit of the p66 WT/p51 INSmutant tends to self-dimerize and form the catalytically active p66 homodimer. Discussion In an earlier investigation on the role of the p51 subunit of HIV-1 RT, we demonstrated that decrease in size of its β7-β8 loop impairs the catalytic function of the heterodimer [ 15 ] . In the present studies, we demonstrate that maintaining the wild type size of this loop in the p51 subunit is critical for dimerization of the enzyme and its catalytic activity. Duplication of the β7-β8 loop sequence selectively in the p66 subunit did not affect the dimer formation, DNA binding or polymerase activity of the p66 INS/p51 WTmutant. However, insertion of the same amino acid residues in the β7-β8 loop of p51 prevented stable dimerization of the p51 INSsubunit with either p66 INSor p66 WTand adversely impacted the DNA binding, polymerase and RNase H activities. Earlier, we have shown that p51 facilitates the loading of the p66 subunit on to the template primer [ 14 ] . Therefore, the impaired polymerase activity and template-primer binding affinity of HIV-1 RT mutants carrying insertion in p51 may be due to their inability to load the catalytic p66 (p66 INS) on the template primer. These altered biophysical/enzymatic properties of these insertion mutants may be attributed to the reduced dimer stability. Crystal structures of HIV-1 RT show that p66 and p51 assume different folding patterns and tertiary structures [ 11 12 ] . It has been proposed that p66 in a monomeric form exists in a closed conformation similar to p51 [ 26 ] . Following dimerization with another molecule of p51 (or p66), it assumes an open conformation [ 11 14 15 ] . The polymerase domain of p51 is buried within its core. This difference in tertiary structures between the two subunits makes the dimer asymmetric. The amino acid residues at the contact interface differ with respect to their position and location in the 3-D structure. The counterpart of amino acid residues of p66 located at the contact interface are buried in the p51 folded conformation, whereas those of p51 are scattered in the p66 'open' conformation (Fig. 6). Of the several domain interactions between p66 and p51, the β7-β8 loop of p51 is strategically positioned to interact with the residues on the floor of the palm subdomain of p66. It has been suggested that the stability of the dimer is related to the buried surface area between the two subunits [ 11 12 ] . In the nevirapine-bound HIV-1 RT crystal structure, the total contact surface area between the subunits is approximately ~4600 Å 2. The two major contact regions between the subunits which provide it stability are their connection subdomains and the thumb of p51 and RNase H domain of p66. These contacts account for approximately two third of the total buried surface area. Interestingly, the marginal decrease in the total surface area due to deletion of four residues in the β7-β8 loop does not account for the dimer instability, thus suggesting that polar interactions of residues in the β7-β8 loop of p51 with the palm subdomain of p66 may play a role in conferring stability to the heterodimer. The observation that a single point mutation at L289 of p66, a residue not in direct contact with p51, also destabilizes the dimer [ 27 28 ] indicates that other factors may also contribute towards dimer stability. In order to analyze the impact of inserting the six amino acid peptide in the β7-β8 loop of p51, we used the molecular modeling approach. A search in the database of known protein structures employing the 'loop-search' algorithm of SYBYL yielded 100 loops, of which only five were sterically permissible. The loop exhibiting the best homology was incorporated in the modeled structure (Fig. 7). This loop of 9 amino acids (RFNAHGDVN) from the protein S. lectin formed a short anti-parallel two strand β-sheet. This inserted loop lies in the vicinity of the palm subdomain of p66 and exhibits additional hydrophobic and polar interactions with residues in the palm subdomain of p66, not seen in the wild type structure. These additional interactions are expected to enhance the stability of the dimer. However, sedimentation analysis indicates that the insertion mutants form unstable dimer. This implies that the insertion may have altered the relative position of the subdomains in the two subunits thereby perturbing the dimer stability. In summary, the β7-β8 loop of p51 is an important structural element involved in imparting stability to the heterodimer and in opening the polymerase cleft of p66 for catalysis. Materials and methods Plasmid and clones The expression vector pET-28a and E. coli expression strain BL21 (DE3) were obtained from Novagen. The HIV-1RT expression clones (pKK223-3 RT66 and pET-28a-RT51) constructed in this laboratory [ 29 30 31 ] were used for PCR amplification and construction of the insertion mutants in the p66 and p51 subunits of HIV-1 RT. An HIV-RNA expression clone pHIV-PBS was a generous gift from Dr. M. A. Wainberg [ 32 ] . Insertion of 6 amino acid residues in the β7-β8 loop The pKK-RT66 clone containing two unique restriction sites, Hpa1 and Stu1 , at codons 136 and 140 in the RT coding region [ 15 ] was used for insertion of 6 amino-acid residues in the β7-β8 loop of the p66 and p51 subunit. The pKK-RT66 clone was digested with HpaI restriction enzyme to generate a blunt end at codon 136. For insertion, two complementary pre-kinased 18-mer synthetic DNA oligos having the following sequences: 5'-ATA AAC AAT GAG ACA ATA-3 (sense strand) and 3'-TAT TTG TTA CTC TGT TAT-5' (antisense strand) were hybridized. The 18-mer duplex DNA encoding the insertion peptide (Ile-Asn-Asn-Glu-Thr-Ile) was ligated with Hpa1 digested pKK-RT66 in between codon 135 and 136. The positive clones were screened in E. coli HB101 by the absence of an Hpa1 site and the correct orientation of the insertion was confirmed by DNA sequencing. This construct expresses the p66+6aa subunit without His tag sequences. A His-tag at the N-terminal of the p66+6aa subunit was introduced by sub cloning the Bal-I and Hind III fragment of pKKRT66+6aa into pET-28a-RT66 expression cassette. A unique Sac I site was also introduced in pKK-RT66 template at codon 440. The construction of P51+6aa was carried out by removal of the 360 bp fragment from pKK-RT66+6aa by restriction digestion with SacI followed by re-ligation of the vector ends. The insertion mutant in pET28a and pKK223-3 vectors were introduced into E. coli BL-21 (DE3) pLys S and E. coli JM109, respectively, for expression. Induction of the enzyme protein was carried out as described before for the wild type HIV-1RT [ 29 ] . The enzyme with the hexahistidine-tag was purified from bacterial lysates by immobilized metal affinity chromatography [ 33 ] , while non-hexahistidine-tagged enzyme was purified using the phosphocellulose and Q-Sepharose columns as described previously [ 24 ] . Preparation of the heterodimeric enzyme with subunit specific insertion The p51 subunit with a hexahistidine-tag and a non-tagged p66 were used to generate the heterodimers containing insertion in either or both of the subunits. For each set of heterodimers, 260 μg of p51 was mixed with 660 μg of p66 in the buffer containing 50 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.8, 60 mM KCl and 5 mM MgCl 2 . The rationale for using a 1:3 ratio of p51 to p66 was to saturate the His-tagged p51 with the non-tagged p66, ensuring heterodimer formation and eliminating excess p66 during IMAC purification. The mixture was incubated for 16 hours at 4°C and applied to (0.5 mL) Ni 2+iminodiacetic-Sepharose (IDA-Sepharose) column, which was pre-equilibrated with the binding buffer (20 mM Tris HCl pH 7.8, 500 mM NaCl and 5 mM Imidazole). The column was washed with 15 mL of the same buffer to remove the excess of p66 that was not dimerized with p51 bound to the IDA-sepharose column. The heterodimeric RT was then eluted from the column with elution buffer (20 mM Tris HCl pH 7.8, 500 mM NaCl and 250 mM imidazole). Fractions of 0.5 mL were collected and an aliquot of each fraction was analyzed by SDS-PAGE using Coomassie Blue stain. The fractions containing approximately equal band intensity of p66 and p51 were dialyzed against a storage buffer (50 mM Tris HCl pH 7.0, 200 mM NaCl and 50% Glycerol) and this enzyme preparation was used in all experiments. Glycerol gradient ultra centrifugation Fifty micrograms of the enzyme protein in 100 μL of buffer (50 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.8, 1 mM DTT and 400 mM NaCl) was carefully loaded onto 5 mL of 10-30% glycerol gradients prepared in the same buffer. The gradients were centrifuged at 48,000 rpm in an SW48 rotor for 22 h at 4°C. Fractions (200 μL) were collected from the bottom of the tube and aliquots of these fractions were electrophoresed using SDS PAGE and Coomassie Blue stain to identify the protein peak. The polymerase activity in the gradient fractions were analyzed by extension of the labeled (dT) 18 annealed to poly (rA) template. Every third fraction between 7 and 33 of the glycerol gradient was diluted 10-fold and analyzed for its polymerase activity. Reactions were carried out at 37°C for 2 min at 20 μM dTTP concentration and quenched with Sanger's gel loading dye [ 35 ] . The reaction products were resolved by denaturing polyacrylamide-urea gel electrophoresis and analyzed on a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc.). DNA polymerase assay Polymerase activity of the HIV-1RT WT and insertion mutant enzymes was determined using two different template-primers: U-5PBS HIV-1 RNA and synthetic 49-mer U5-PBS DNA templates primed with the 17-mer PBS primer [ 36 ] . Assays were carried out in a 50 μL volume containing 50 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.8, 100 μg/mL bovine serum albumin, 5 mM MgCl 2 , 1 mM dithiothreitol, 60 mM KCl, 100 nM template-primer, 50 μM of each of the four dNTPs with one of them being 32P-labeled (0.1 μCi/nmol dNTP) and 21 nM enzyme. Reactions were incubated at 37°C for 3 min and terminated by the addition of ice-cold 5% trichloroacetic acid containing 5 mM inorganic pyrophosphate. Following termination, the reaction mixtures were filtered on Whatman GF/B filters. The filters were then dried, immersed in scintillation fluid and counted in a liquid scintillation counter. Gel analysis of RNA and DNA dependent polymerase activities The U5-PBS HIV-1 RNA and heteropolymeric synthetic U5-PBS HIV-1 DNA templates primed with the 17-mer PBS DNA primer were used to assess the polymerase activities of the wild type and mutant heterodimeric enzymes. The primers were 5'-labeled using γ- 32P-ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase according to the standard protocol [ 37 ] . Polymerase reactions were carried out by incubating 2.5 nM template primer with 50 nM of the wild type HIV-1RT or its mutant derivative in a total reaction volume of 6 μL containing 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 100 μg/mL bovine serum albumin, 5 mM MgCl 2 and 50 μM of each dNTP. Reactions were initiated by the addition of enzyme and terminated by the addition of an equal volume (6 μL) of Sanger's gel loading dye [ 35 ] . The reaction products were resolved by denaturing poly acrylamide-urea gel electrophoresis and analyzed on a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc.). Template-Primer (TP) binding affinity of the wild type enzyme and its mutant derivatives The dissociation constants (K d ) of the E-TP binary complexes of the wild type HIV-1 RT and its mutant derivatives were determined as described by Tong et al. [ 25 ] . The heteropolymeric 33-mer DNA (0.4 nM) annealed to 5'- 32P-labeled 21-mer primer (0.3 nM) was incubated with varying concentrations of the wild type enzyme and its mutant derivatives in a total volume of 10 μL containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 5 mM MgCl 2 and 0.01 % BSA. Following incubation of the mixture for 10 min at 4°C, equal volume of 2× gel-loading dye containing 0.25% bromophenol blue and 20% glycerol was added. The E-TP binary complexes formed were resolved at 4°C on 6% native polyacrylamide gel using Tris-Borate buffer (85 mM Tris, 85 mM Boric acid, pH 8.0). The amounts of the TP in the binary complex (E-TP) and in free form with respect to the varying concentrations of the enzyme protein were determined by PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Pharmacia) analysis of the gel. The fraction of the bound DNA was plotted against enzyme concentration and the K d [DNA] value was determined as the RT concentration at which 50% of DNA is bound. Ternary complex formation assay The ternary complex (E-DNA-dNTP) formation was assessed by incubating the binary complexes of enzyme and dideoxy terminated template primer in the presence of next correct dNTP [ 25 ] . The binary complexes were formed by incubating 10-50 nM of the wild type enzyme or its mutant derivatives with 0.3 nM of 5'- 32P-labeled dideoxy terminated 33-mer/21-mer template-primer as described above. The chosen concentration of enzyme was such that resulted in almost complete shift during E-TP complex formation. The E-TP-dNTP ternary complex formation was assessed by the addition of dNTP complementary to the next template base (in this case dGTP, 200 μM). Following incubation with dNTP at 4°C for 10 min, 300 fold molar excess of a DNA trap was added to the incubation mixture to assess the stability of the binary and ternary complexes formed by the enzyme. The complexes were resolved on a 6% native polyacrylamide followed by phosphorImaging. The extent of E-TP-dNTP ternary complexes formed was quantified using ImageQuant software. RNase H activity assay We used a 5'- 32P labeled 30-mer synthetic U5-PBS RNA template annealed with a complementary 30-mer DNA to determine the RNase H activity of the enzymes [ 31 ] . The reaction mixture contained labeled RNA-DNA hybrid (10 K Cerenkov cpm), 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 60 mM KCl, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 5 mM MgCl 2 , and 20 ng of enzyme in a final volume of 5 μl. Reactions were carried out at 37°C for 30 sec and 1 min and terminated by the addition of equal volume of Sanger's gel loading dye [ 35 ] . The cleavage products were analyzed on an 8% denaturing polyacrylamide-urea gel and scanned on a phosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics Inc.).