All published worksheets from http://sagenb.org
Image: ubuntu2004
Modeling synaptic currents
Jose Guzman(*) and Sarit Goswami
version 1.0.0
Oct 29, 2010
(*) Please send any suggestions or comments to [email protected]
Index
1. Introduction
Current flows through the cell membrane via ion permeable molecules called ion channels. Different ion channels with diverse ion selectivites contribute to the total membrane current of the cell. For instance, while calcium channels provide a source of positive ions, chloride ions will be responsible for the influx of negative ions. By convention, membrane current is defined as positive when positive ions leave the cell and negative when positive ions enter it.
We can calculate the current through a channel simply in terms of Ohms' law: the ionic current is proportional to the voltage difference across the membrane. The net ionic current will be given by the potential difference between the membrane potential (V) and the reversal potential (E) for the ion permeable to the channel. This is called driving force. Thus, we can define the current through a single ion channel as follows.
- where is the membrane current contributed by the channel A (in pA)
- is the driving force for the type of ion mediated by channel A (in mV)
- is the conductance (inverse of resistance) for this channel (in pS)
The total membrane current () is simply the sum of all the ionic contributions of different channel types.
2. Synaptic conductance
Most ligand-gated ion channels (AMPAR, GABA A) display an approximately linear current-voltage relationship when they open. They can be modeled as an purely ohmic conductance multiplied by the driving force. This gives the synaptic current.
Thus, to model the synaptic currents we could simply model the synaptic conductance. If we want to model synaptic potentials, we could simply multiply the synaptic conductance by the channel driving force. It can be formulated as follows:
${\displaystyle
\frac{dO(t)}{dt}=-k_{decay}O(t)}$
where is the fraction of channels in the open state. An alternative formulation is:
${\displaystyle \tau
\frac{dg_{syn}(t)}{dt}=-g_{syn}(t) + g_{max}X(t)}$
where is the synaptic conductance, is the decay time-constant (), and is the delta function:
This function simply returns zero if and 1 otherwise. Then, the synaptic conductance will be zero if is not and otherwise. If we want to apply several stimulations we could define various times at which the delta function will not be zero. Then:
3. Conductance-based models:
3.1 Instantaneous rise and single exponential decay:
This model simply assumes that the synaptic conductance has an instantaneous rise at time=0, where all the channels will be opened. This model is based on the assumption that neurotransmitter released is instantaneously released, and homogeneously distributed in the synaptic cleft. Neurotransmitter binding will occur very fast, and then all channels will change from a closed to the open state. The transmitter disappears, so the open state (and therefore the conductance) decays exponential.
This model can be well applied to certain inhibitory post-synaptic currents (IPSCs), because the rising phase is much shorter than the decay phase, or for fast AMPA-mediated excitatory post-synaptic currents.