Test7116786.java

/*
 * Copyright (c) 2012, 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
 * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
 *
 * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
 * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
 * published by the Free Software Foundation.
 *
 * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
 * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
 * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License
 * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
 * accompanied this code).
 *
 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
 * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
 * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
 *
 * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
 * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
 * questions.
 *
 */

/*
 * @test Test7116786
 * @summary verify that VerifyError messages are as expected
 * @library testcases.jar
 * @run main/othervm -Xverify:all Test7116786
 */


/**
 * This class contains information regarding when a VerifyError is thrown
 * in the verifier.  Most of the data is informational-only, and can be
 * used to track down where and why VerifyErrors are thrown.  As such it
 * is possible the information may go out-of-date.
 *
 * The only fields used for the purpose of testing is the 'caseName' and
 * the 'message'.  The 'caseName' corresponds to a classfile which exhibits
 * the VerifyError, and the 'message' is a regular expression which we expect
 * to match the verify error message.  If the 'message' doesn't match what
 * we expect, it warrents investigation to see if we are still triggering
 * the VerifyError that we expect.  It could simply just be that the message
 * changed, which is fine.
 *
 * Some cases are not testable, either because the code is probably unreachable
 * or the test classfile would be too onerous to create.  These cases are
 * marked with 'testable' == false, and the test runner will skip them.
 */
class Case {
    private String caseName;    // Name of the case
    private String file;        // Source file where VerifyError is thrown
    private String location;    // enclosing function or switch case
    private String description; // What causes this VerifyError
    private String message;     // The VerifyError message used.

    private boolean testable;   // Whether this case is testable or not.

    public Case(String caseName, String file, boolean testable,
                String location, String description, String message) {
        this.caseName = caseName;
        this.file = file;
        this.testable = testable;
        this.location = location;
        this.description = description;
        this.message = message;
    }

    String getCaseName() { return this.caseName; }
    String getFile() { return this.file; }
    String getLocation() { return this.location; }
    String getDescription() { return this.description; }
    String getMessage() { return this.message; }

    boolean isTestable() { return this.testable; }
}

/**
 * These are the locations in the source code where VerifyErrors are thrown
 * as of today, 2012/07/18.  These may change as the verification code is
 * modified, which is ok.  This test is trying to provide coverage for all
 * VerifyErrors (just to make sure there are no crashes) and it's probably
 * not necessary to update it every time the VM changes.
 */
class VerifyErrorCases {
    public static final Case[] cases = {

        new Case("case00", "stackMapFrame.cpp", true, "pop_stack_ex",
                 "stack underflow",
                 "Operand stack underflow"),

        new Case("case01", "stackMapFrame.cpp", true, "pop_stack_ex",
                 "stack pop not assignable to expected",
                 "Bad type on operand stack"),

        new Case("case02", "stackMapFrame.cpp", true, "get_local",
                 "local index out-of-bounds",
                 "Local variable table overflow"),

        new Case("case03", "stackMapFrame.cpp", true, "get_local",
                 "local not assignable to expected",
                 "Bad local variable type"),

        new Case("case04", "stackMapFrame.cpp", true, "get_local_2",
                 "local index out-of-bounds [type2]",
                 "get long/double overflows locals"),

        new Case("case05", "stackMapFrame.cpp", true, "get_local_2",
                 "local not assignabled to expected [type2]",
                 "Bad local variable type"),

        /* Unreachable: Can't split long/double on stack */
        new Case("case06", "stackMapFrame.cpp", false, "get_local_2",
                 "local second-word not assignabled to expected",
                 "Bad local variable type"),

        new Case("case07", "stackMapFrame.cpp", true, "set_local",
                 "local index out-of-bounds",
                 "Local variable table overflow"),

        new Case("case08", "stackMapFrame.cpp", true, "set_local_2",
                 "local index out-of-bounds [type2]",
                 "Local variable table overflow"),

        new Case("case09", "stackMapFrame.hpp", true, "push_stack",
                 "stack overflow",
                 "Operand stack overflow"),

        new Case("case10", "stackMapFrame.hpp", true, "push_stack_2",
                 "stack overflow [type2]",
                 "Operand stack overflow"),

        new Case("case11", "stackMapFrame.hpp", true, "pop_stack",
                 "stack underflow",
                 "Operand stack underflow"),

        new Case("case12", "stackMapTable.cpp", true, "StackMapTable ctor",
                 "stackmap offset beyond code size",
                 "StackMapTable error: bad offset"),

        new Case("case13", "stackMapTable.cpp", true, "match_stackmap",
                 "no stackmap frame at expected location",
                 "Expecting a stackmap frame at branch target "),

        new Case("case14", "stackMapTable.cpp", true, "check_jump_target",
                 "no stackmap frame at jump location or bad jump",
                 "Inconsistent stackmap frames at branch target "),

        /* Backward jump with uninit is allowed starting with JDK 8 */
        new Case("case15", "stackMapTable.cpp", false, "check_new_object",
                 "backward jump with uninit",
                 "Uninitialized object exists on backward branch "),

        /* Unreachable: wide instructions verified during bytecode analysis */
        new Case("case16", "verifier.cpp", false, "loop header",
                 "bad op in wide instruction",
                 "Bad wide instruction"),

        new Case("case17", "verifier.cpp", true, "case iaload",
                 "TOS not X array",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in iaload"),

        new Case("case18", "verifier.cpp", true, "case baload",
                 "TOS not X array",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in baload"),

        new Case("case19", "verifier.cpp", true, "case caload",
                 "TOS not X array",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in caload"),

        new Case("case20", "verifier.cpp", true, "case saload",
                 "TOS not X array",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in saload"),

        new Case("case21", "verifier.cpp", true, "case laload",
                 "TOS not X array",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in laload"),

        new Case("case22", "verifier.cpp", true, "case faload",
                 "TOS not X array",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in faload"),

        new Case("case23", "verifier.cpp", true, "case daload",
                 "TOS not X array",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in daload"),

        new Case("case24", "verifier.cpp", true, "case aaload",
                 "TOS not X array",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in aaload"),

        new Case("case25", "verifier.cpp", true, "case iastore",
                 "TOS not int array",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in iastore"),

        new Case("case26", "verifier.cpp", true, "case bastore",
                 "TOS not byte array",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in bastore"),

        new Case("case27", "verifier.cpp", true, "case castore",
                 "TOS not char array",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in castore"),

        new Case("case28", "verifier.cpp", true, "case sastore",
                 "TOS not short array",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in sastore"),

        new Case("case29", "verifier.cpp", true, "case lastore",
                 "TOS not long array",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in lastore"),

        new Case("case30", "verifier.cpp", true, "case fastore",
                 "TOS not float array",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in fastore"),

        new Case("case31", "verifier.cpp", true, "case dastore",
                 "TOS not double array",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in dastore"),

        new Case("case32", "verifier.cpp", true, "case aastore",
                 "TOS not object array",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in aastore"),

        /* Unreachable: In order to hit this case, we would need a
         * category2_1st at TOS which is not possible. */
        new Case("case33", "verifier.cpp", false, "case pop2",
                 "TOS is category2_1st (would split)",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in pop2"),

        /* Unreachable: In order to hit this case, we would need a
         * category2_1st at stack depth 2 with category_1 on TOS which is not
         * possible. */
        new Case("case34", "verifier.cpp", false, "case dup_x2",
                 "TOS-1 is category2_1st (would split)",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in dup_x2"),

        /* Unreachable: In order to hit this case, we would need a
         * category2_1st at TOS which is not possible. */
        new Case("case35", "verifier.cpp", false, "case dup2",
                 "TOS-1 is category2_1st (would split)",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in dup2"),

        /* Unreachable: In order to hit this case, we would need a
         * category2_1st at TOS which is not possible. */
        new Case("case36", "verifier.cpp", false, "case dup2_x1",
                 "TOS-1 is category2_1st (would split)",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in dup2_x1"),

        /* Unreachable: In order to hit this case, we would need a
         * category2_1st at TOS which is not possible. */
        new Case("case37", "verifier.cpp", false, "case dup2_x2",
                 "TOS-1 is category2_1st (would split)",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in dup2_x2"),

        /* Unreachable: In order to hit this case, we would need a
         * category2_1st at stack depth 3 with either 2 category_1 or 1
         * category_2 on TOS, which is not possible. */
        new Case("case38", "verifier.cpp", false, "case dup2_x2",
                 "TOS-3 is category2_1st (would split)",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in dup2_x2"),

        new Case("case39", "verifier.cpp", true, "case return",
                 "return type of method is not void",
                 "Method expects a return value"),

        new Case("case40", "verifier.cpp", true, "case return",
                 "return with uninitialized this ",
                 "Constructor must call super() or this() before return"),

        new Case("case41", "verifier.cpp", true, "case new",
                 "cp index not a class type",
                 "Illegal new instruction"),

        new Case("case42", "verifier.cpp", true, "case arraylength",
                 "TOS is not an array",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in arraylength"),

        new Case("case43", "verifier.cpp", true, "case multianewarray",
                 "CP index does not refer to array type",
                 "Illegal constant pool index in multianewarray instruction"),

        new Case("case44", "verifier.cpp", true, "case multianewarray",
                 "Bad dimension (<1) or does not match CP signature",
                 "Illegal dimension in multianewarray instruction: "),

        new Case("case45", "verifier.cpp", true, "case default",
                 "Unrecognized bytecode",
                 "Bad instruction: "),

        new Case("case46", "verifier.cpp", true, "loop end",
                 "control flow falls off method",
                 "Control flow falls through code end"),

        new Case("case47", "verifier.cpp", true, "generate_code_data",
                 "illegal bytecode via RawBytecodeStream (breakpoint)",
                 "Bad instruction"),

        new Case("case48", "verifier.cpp", true, "generate_code_data",
                 "illegal bytecode via RawBytecodeStream (other illegal)",
                 "Bad instruction"),

        new Case("case49", "verifier.cpp", true,
                 "verify_exception_handler_table",
                 "catch_type is not throwable",
                 "Catch type is not a subclass of Throwable in " +
                 "exception handler "),

        new Case("case50", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_stackmap_table",
                 "missing a stack map frame @ target location (mid table)",
                 "Expecting a stack map frame"),

        new Case("case51", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_stackmap_table",
                 "stack map does not match?",
                 "Instruction type does not match stack map"),

        new Case("case52", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_stackmap_table",
                 "missing a stack map frame @ target location (end of table)",
                 "Expecting a stack map frame"),

        new Case("case53", "verifier.cpp", true,
                 "verify_exception_handler_targets",
                 "stackmap mismatch at exception handler",
                 "Stack map does not match the one at exception handler "),

        new Case("case54", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_cp_index",
                 "constant pool index is out-of-bounds",
                 "Illegal constant pool index "),

        new Case("case55", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_cp_type",
                 "constant pool entry is not expected type",
                 "Illegal type at constant pool entry "),

        new Case("case56", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_cp_class_type",
                 "constant pool entry is not an object type",
                 "Illegal type at constant pool entry "),

        /* Unreachable: verify_cp_type gates this case */
        new Case("case57", "verifier.cpp", false, "verify_ldc",
                 "invalid constant pool index in ldc",
                 "Invalid index in ldc"),

        /* No longer a valid test case for bytecode version >= 51. Nonzero
         * padding bytes are permitted with lookupswitch and tableswitch
         * bytecodes as of JVMS 3d edition */
        new Case("case58", "verifier.cpp", false, "verify_switch",
                 "bad switch padding",
                 "Nonzero padding byte in lookupswitch or tableswitch"),

        new Case("case59", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_switch",
                 "tableswitch low is greater than high",
                 "low must be less than or equal to high in tableswitch"),

        /* Unreachable on 64-bit?  Only way to get here is to overflow
         * the 'keys' variable which can't happen on 64-bit since we're dealing
         * with 32-bit values.  Perhaps reachable on 32-bit but the
         * triggering class would be quite large */
        new Case("case60", "verifier.cpp", false, "verify_switch",
                 "high - low + 1 < 0 (overflow?)",
                 "too many keys in tableswitch"),

        /* Would have to create a 16G classfile to trip this.  Possible but
         * not reasonable to do in a test.  */
        new Case("case61", "verifier.cpp", false, "verify_switch",
                 "lookupswitch keys < 0",
                 "number of keys in lookupswitch less than 0"),

        new Case("case62", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_switch",
                 "lookupswitch keys out-of-order",
                 "Bad lookupswitch instruction"),

        /* Unreachable: Class file parser verifies Fieldref contents */
        new Case("case63", "verifier.cpp", false, "verify_field_instructions",
                 "referenced class is not an CP object",
                 "Expecting reference to class in class "),

        new Case("case64", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_field_instructions",
                 "TOS not assignable to field type in putfield",
                 "Bad type on operand stack in putfield"),

        new Case("case65", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_field_instructions",
                 "TOS not assignable to class when accessing protected field",
                 "Bad access to protected data in getfield"),

        new Case("case66", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_invoke_init",
                 "Uninit_this is not of the current type or it's supertype",
                 "Bad <init> method call"),

        /* Unreachable:  Stack map parsing ensures valid type and new
         * instructions have a valid BCI. */
        new Case("case67", "verifier.cpp", false, "verify_invoke_init",
                 "Uninit type with bad new instruction index",
                 "Expecting new instruction"),

        new Case("case68", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_invoke_init",
                 "calling other class's <init> method",
                 "Call to wrong <init> method"),

        new Case("case69", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_invoke_init",
                 "Calling protected <init> and type unassignable from current",
                 "Bad access to protected <init> method"),

        new Case("case70", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_invoke_init",
                 "TOS is not an uninitialized (or Uninit_this) type",
                 "Bad operand type when invoking <init>"),

        new Case("case71", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_invoke_instructions",
                 "Arg count in instruction doesn't match signature",
                 "Inconsistent args count operand in invokeinterface"),

        new Case("case72", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_invoke_instructions",
                 "Non-zero pad in invokeinterface",
                 "Fourth operand byte of invokeinterface must be zero"),

        new Case("case73", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_invoke_instructions",
                 "Non-zero pad in invokedynamic",
                 "Third and fourth operand bytes of " +
                 "invokedynamic must be zero"),

        new Case("case74", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_invoke_instructions",
                 "Non-invokespecial trying to invoke a '<' method",
                 "Illegal call to internal method"),

        new Case("case75", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_invoke_instructions",
                 "invokespecial and current unassignable from referenced type",
                 "Bad invokespecial instruction: current class isn't " +
                 "assignable to reference class."),

        new Case("case76", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_invoke_instructions",
                 "TOS not assignable to current when calling protected method",
                 "Bad access to protected data in invokevirtual"),

        /* Unreachable:  class file parser enforces void signature */
        new Case("case77", "verifier.cpp", false, "verify_invoke_instructions",
                 "<init> method is not void return",
                 "Return type must be void in <init> method"),

        new Case("case78", "verifier.cpp", true, "get_newarray_type",
                 "newarray type invalid",
                 "Illegal newarray instruction"),

        new Case("case79", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_return_value",
                 "void return from method which has a return value",
                 "Method expects a return value"),

        new Case("case80", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_return_value",
                 "TOS type does not match signature",
                 "Bad return type"),

        new Case("case81", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_stackmap_table",
                 "stack map does not match (flags)",
                 "Instruction type does not match stack map")
    };
}

public class Test7116786 {
    public static void main(String argv[]) throws Exception {
        for (Case c : VerifyErrorCases.cases) {
            System.out.println("******** " + c.getCaseName() + " ********");
            if (c.isTestable()) {
                try {
                    ClassLoader cl = Test7116786.class.getClassLoader();
                    Class<?> cls = Class.forName(c.getCaseName(), true, cl);
                    throw new RuntimeException(
                        "++ FAIL: No verify error encountered");
                } catch (VerifyError ve) {
                    String message = c.getMessage();
                    String veMessage = ve.getMessage();
                    System.out.print(veMessage);
                    if (!veMessage.startsWith(message)) {
                        // We're not seeing the message we expect.  Could be
                        // that we've gotten the wrong VerifyError case, or
                        // maybe the message changed.
                        System.out.println("++ FAIL? " +
                            "Message does not match what was expected: " +
                            message);
                        continue;
                    }
                    if (!veMessage.contains("Exception Details:") &&
                        !veMessage.contains("Reason:")) {
                        System.out.println("++ FAIL: No details found");
                        throw new RuntimeException("FAIL: No details found");
                    }
                    System.out.println("++ PASS");
                }
            } else {
               System.out.println("++ SKIPPED");
            }
        }
    }
}