kevinlui's site
8.1 Dot Products and Orthogonal Sets
Definition: Suppose that and are both vectors in . Then the dot product of and is .
Theorem: Let be in . Then the dot product has the following properties:
(Symmetry) ,
(Linearity) ,
(Positive Definite) for all , and if and and only if .
Definition: Let be a vector in , then the norm of is given by . Note that .
For two vectors and , the distance between and is given by .
Definition: Let and be vectors in are orthogonal if .
Theorem: (Pythagorean Theorem) Suppose that and are in . Then if and only if .
Theorem: (Triangle Inequality) If and are in , then .
Definition: Let be a subspace of . A vector is orthogonal to if it is orthogonal to every vector in . The set of all vectors orthogonal to is called the orthogonal complement of and is denoted .
The orthogonal complement to a subspace is also a subspace.
Theorem: Let be a basis for a subspace . Then ( is orthogonal to ) if and only if is orthogonal to each .
Example: Let and and be the span of and . Is ? What is a basis for ?
Definition: A set of vectors in form an orthogonal set the vectors are pairwise orthogonal. This means that if and are distinct vectors in , then .
Example:
Is the standard basis an orthogonal set?
What's a basis that is not orthogonal?
Theorem: An orthogonal set of nonzero vectors is linearly independent.
Definition: A basis that is orthogonal as a set is called an orthogonal basis. A basis that is orthogonal as a set and is comprised of vectors of norm 1 is called an orthonormal basis.
Theorem: Let be a subspace with orthogonal basis . Then any vector can be written as a linear combination with .
Example: (THIS IS A BAD EXAMPLE. TURNS OUT NOT TO BE ORTHOGONAL.) Let . Write as a linear combination of .
For finite dimensional spaces, we have that . Use this to show that every subspace is the null space of some matrix.