CoCalc Logo Icon
StoreFeaturesDocsShareSupportNewsAboutSign UpSign In

Real-time collaboration for Jupyter Notebooks, Linux Terminals, LaTeX, VS Code, R IDE, and more,
all in one place.

| Download

GAP 4.8.9 installation with standard packages -- copy to your CoCalc project to get it

Views: 418346
LoadPackage("scscp");

#############################################################################
#
# We store the list of 3432 primes less than 32000, extending the 
# list of 168 primes less than 1000, that is defined in GAP
#
MakeReadWriteGlobal( "Primes" );
Primes := Filtered( [ 1 .. 32000 ], IsPrimeInt );;
MakeReadOnlyGlobal( "Primes" );


LiouvilleFunction:=function( n )
#
# For an integer n, the Liouville's function of n is equal to (-1)^r(n), 
# where r(n) is the number of prime factors of n, counted according to 
# their multiplicity, with r(1)=0.
#
if n=1 then
  return 1;
elif Length( FactorsInt(n) ) mod 2 = 0  then
  return 1;
else
  return -1;
fi;
end;


#############################################################################
#
# The summatory Liouville's function L(x) is the sum
# of values of LiouvilleFunction(n) for all n from [ 1 .. x ].
#
# G. Pólya in 1919 conjectured that L(x)<=0 for all x >=2.
#
# C.B.Haselgrove in 1958 proved that this conjecture is false
# and there are infinitely many integers x with L(x)>0, but
# he neither presented such x nor give the upper bound for 
# the minimal x with L(x)>0. 
#
# A computer-aided search reported in [ R. Sherman Lehman, 
# On Liouville's Funcion, Mathematics of Computation, Vol.14, 
# No.72 (Oct., 1960), pp.311-320 ] found the counterexample to 
# be L(906180359)=+1, without claiming its minimality.
#
# The smallest counterexample is n = 906150257, reported in
# [ M. Tanaka, A Numerical Investigation on Cumulative Sum of the 
# Liouville Function. Tokyo Journal of Mathematics 3, (1980) 187-189 ]
# The Pólya conjecture fails to hold for most values of n in the region 
# of 906150257 <= n <= 906488079. In this region, the function reaches 
# a maximum value of 829 at n = 906316571.
#
SummatoryLiouvilleFunction := function( x )
local s,n;
s := 0;
n := 1;
repeat
  s := s + LiouvilleFunction(n);
  n := n+1;
until n>x;
return s;
end;


PartialSummatoryLiouvilleFunction := function( interval )
#
# To parallelize computation of the summatory Liouville's
# function, we introduce its partial analogue to split the
# whole sum on partial sums that may be computed independently.
#
# The argument 'interval' is a list [x1,x2] of length two.
# The function returns the sum of LiouvilleFunction(n) for 
# all n from [ x1 .. x2 ].
#
local x1,x2,s,n;
x1:=interval[1];
x2:=interval[2];
s := 0;
n := x1;
repeat
  s := s + LiouvilleFunction(n);
  n := n+1;
until n>x2;
return s;
end;


ParSummatoryLiouvilleFunction := function( x, chunksize )
#
# To parallelize the computation of L(x), we split the range [ 1 .. x ]
# on intervals of the length 'chunksize', and then compute the sum
# of values of the Liouville's function for each interval in parallel.
#
# We may experiment with various values of 'chunksize'. Very small 
# chunksize will cause an overhead because of longer list of intervals
# (cost of time for its generation and storing in memory) and also
# more intensive master-slave communication. Since the computation of
# one value of Liouville's function for one number is rather fast, its
# speed will be comparable with the speed of data exchange between
# master and slave, and on extremely small chunksize values instead
# of speedup there will be slowdown.
#
local intervals, r1, r2, t1, t2, result;
if x < chunksize then
  intervals := [ [ 1, x ] ];
else
  intervals := [];
  r2:=x;
  r1:=x-chunksize+1;
  while r1 > 1 do
    Add( intervals, [ r1, r2 ] );
    r1:=r1-chunksize;
    r2:=r2-chunksize;
  od;
  Add( intervals, [ 1, r2 ] );
fi;
result := Sum( ParListWithSCSCP( intervals, "PartialSummatoryLiouvilleFunction" ) );
return result ;
end;