Book a Demo!
CoCalc Logo Icon
StoreFeaturesDocsShareSupportNewsAboutPoliciesSign UpSign In
Download
29547 views
1
2
3
4
5
6
Why the GOP Loves Death
7
8
Chatterbox has pioneered in the emerging field of necro-monetary policy (the
9
study of the impact of economic incentives on the decision to die). First to
10
explicate the implicit logic in the Republican Congress' push to eliminate all
11
inheritance taxes (see
12
Allen, 7/12/99), Chatterbox followed up with empirical evidence in support
13
of Allen's hypothesis that, consistent with economic theory and the human
14
distaste for the tax collector, high estate taxes are positively correlated
15
with low death rates, and, conversely, low estate taxes, such as the GOP seeks,
16
are correlated with high death rates (see
17
Plotz, 7/19/99). Neither of these seminal contributions to the literature,
18
however, satisfactorily explained (or, indeed, even attempted to explicate) the
19
motivation behind the GOP leadership's effort to accelerate the shuffle
20
off this mortal coil into a 50-yard dash.
21
22
Most GOP politicians are, of course, in the forefront of public
23
manifestations of piety. But with regard to the timing of a meeting with the
24
Great Maker, they have been firmly on the side of later rather than sooner. So
25
why would a pro-life caucus push so hard to eliminate a policy instrument, the
26
"death tax," as they routinely denote it, that has such a proven record of
27
encouraging longevity? The answer may be found in a recent
28
study emanating from the Urban Institute. In exploring the ramifications of
29
Social Security's long-range forecasts, researcher Lawrence H. Thompson points
30
to a startling fact. Almost 60 percent of Social Security's much deplored
31
long-term deficit is owing to the expectation that, as the next century
32
progresses, Americans will live still longer and, largely in consequence of
33
their advanced ages, suffer more disability. Thompson suggests only two ways to
34
deal with the projected shortfall: 1) cut benefits or 2) increase the share of
35
GDP devoted to Social Security--i.e., raise taxes. Neither of these
36
alternatives will recommend itself to a Congress whose desire to placate
37
high-voting senior citizens is exceeded only by its desire to deliver big tax
38
cuts. Thus the genius of the death tax repeal proposal: Why not cloak a sharp
39
cut in benefits in the soothing shroud of a tax break? Bill Clinton must be
40
jealous.
41
42
43
44
45
46