Book a Demo!
CoCalc Logo Icon
StoreFeaturesDocsShareSupportNewsAboutPoliciesSign UpSign In
Download
29547 views
1
2
3
4
5
6
How I Learned To Love Labor and Hate the Bomb
7
8
9
Issue 1 is the Senate's defeat of the nuclear test ban
10
treaty. Issue 2 is the AFL-CIO's endorsement of Al Gore. Issue 3 is campaign
11
finance reform.
12
13
The punditocracy splits over the political and
14
substantive fallout, if you will, of the Comprehensive [Nuclear] Test Ban
15
Treaty--which the Senate overwhelmingly defeated last week after President
16
Clinton had begged the GOP to delay the vote. Conservative pundits--such as
17
Robert Novak (NBC's Meet the Press and CNN's Capital Gang ), Brit Hume ( Fox News Sunday ), and Paul Gigot
18
(PBS's NewsHour With Jim Lehrer )--think the
19
defeat resulted from Clinton's hubris and the GOP's sound appraisal of the
20
national interest. Liberal pundits--such as Mark Shields ( NewsHour and Capital Gang ), Margaret
21
Carlson ( Capital Gang ), and Juan Williams
22
( Fox )--think the GOP is risking an arms race in
23
order to humiliate Clinton.
24
25
Some opinion makers, such as Steve Roberts (CNN's Late Edition ), think that the treaty's
26
defeat heralds a Buchananite lurch toward isolationism in the GOP. Moreover,
27
Alfonse D'Amato ( Fox ) and Juan Williams
28
( Fox ) think Clinton will inevitably win the
29
public relations war, given the public's overwhelming support for the treaty.
30
But conservatives such as Paul Gigot ( NewsHour )
31
and Tucker Carlson ( Late Edition ) counter that
32
many former foreign-policy advisers--including some Clinton appointees--opposed
33
the treaty, and that when it comes to foreign policy as a campaign issue,
34
Republicans still have the advantage. (On Capital
35
Gang , Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., notes that only one of the six
36
Republicans up for re-election next year voted for the treaty.) But even
37
Carlson thinks Al Gore's un-glitzy, pro-test-ban TV ad was smart, and Susan
38
Page ( Late Edition ) thinks Gore's pro-treaty
39
stance will help him with women voters (who worry about nuclear apocalypse more
40
than men) and Iowa Democrats (who have a lingering nuclear-freeze streak in
41
them from the 1980s). Only John McLaughlin (PBS's McLaughlin Group ) actually addresses whether we
42
still need to test nukes (McLaughlin thinks we do). (For more on the treaty
43
defeat, see "The Week/The Spin" and "International Papers.")
44
45
Most of the commentariat thinks that Al Gore's
46
endorsement by the AFL-CIO and the NEA represents a small victory. Labor, notes
47
Al Hunt ( Capital Gang ), is still a powerful
48
organizing tool in Iowa. Nevertheless, many pundits point out that the
49
Teamsters and the UAW have not yet endorsed Gore, and that Bill Bradley now has
50
as much money as Gore does. And many also criticize the vice president for
51
telling the Washington Post that he might not seek any campaign assistance
52
from Clinton; that may be a smart strategy in the general election, say Susan
53
Estrich ( Fox ) and D'Amato, but Clinton can still
54
energize the Democratic base during the primary season. (To read Estrich's
55
"Dialogue" on Flytrap, click here.)
56
57
A few programs discuss John McCain and the prospects for campaign finance
58
reform. On Meet the Press , Sen. Robert
59
Torricelli, D-N.J., says he opposes McCain's reform bill because it's too weak,
60
while Sen. McConnell says it's too strong. David Broder ( Meet the Press ) and Sam Donaldson (ABC's This Week ) would like to change
61
the system, but neither knows exactly how. ("One generation's reform is
62
another's problem," Broder observes of the current Watergate-era laws.) DNC
63
Chairman Ed Rendell argues that without soft money, the Democrats wouldn't have
64
a prayer against George W. Bush. George Stephanopoulos ( This Week ) notes that the more McCain's Senate colleagues
65
ostracize him for his crusade against "corruption," the more popular a
66
presidential candidate he's likely to become.
67
68
69
70
Department of Self-Plagiarism
71
72
73
Hewing to the journalistic dictum to "sell every piece
74
twice," Mark Shields has perfected the art of recycling his own sound bites.
75
Here's a sample from the past two weeks:
76
77
[The treaty vote] was, to put it bluntly,
78
impeachment. Betty Currie's name was never mentioned; [an] obstruction of
79
justice charge was never ventilated. There was no chief justice of the United
80
States sitting in the Senate, but that's what it was. It was Impeachment Two.
81
It was getting even with the president.
82
83
84
85
86
-- NewsHour , 10/15
87
88
The reality is very simple. This was not with
89
Betty Currie in the room or not with Bill Rehnquist sitting up there, [but] it
90
was nothing less than Impeachment Two. And that was their chance of getting
91
even.
92
93
94
-- Capital Gang ,
95
10/16
96
97
He had as good a week this week as I've ever seen
98
a non-incumbent presidential candidate have in New York. He spent repeated time
99
in the company of minority groups. He's comfortable there. This is something
100
that most presidential Republican nominees don't do except in a week when the
101
Democrats are holding their convention and there aren't that many cameras
102
around. He does it, he does it easily, comfortably. He brought together George
103
Pataki, the governor, and Rudy Giuliani.
104
105
106
107
108
-- NewsHour , 10/8
109
110
Let me just say I have never seen a candidate for
111
president in my lifetime who was not the nominee of his party have a better
112
week than George W. Bush had. He goes to New York, he makes two minority
113
community appearances. Usually the Republican nominees do their minority
114
appearances during the Democratic convention when there are no families around.
115
He's comfortable, he does it repeatedly. He has--he brings Giuliani and Pataki
116
together.
117
118
119
120
121
-- Capital Gang , 10/9
122
123
124
Last Word
125
126
127
From Capital Gang :
128
129
130
Sen. Mitch
131
McConnell: If you're going to call the Senate corrupt, if you're going
132
to call the members of the Senate corrupt, you need to prove it.
133
134
Soft money goes to political parties. Political parties
135
don't have a vote. Soft money is everything that isn't hard money--let me
136
finish my answer. It finances issue discussion in this country. The
137
New York Times , for example, has had 114
138
editorials on campaign finance reform since the beginning of 1997. That's about
139
one every nine days. They are a corporate soft money issue advocacy outfit, as
140
is this [party] program financed by corporate soft money.
141
142
[McCain's campaign-finance] proposal would single out
143
six committees, the DNC, the national Democratic committees, the national
144
Republican committees, and say, "Only those six can't engage in issue advocacy.
145
Everybody else in America will be doing it but us."
146
147
148
Mark Shields:
149
That's the last word, Mitch McConnell. I just have to say in closing, I've
150
learned tonight that the millions of dollars the Democrats have received from
151
the teachers had nothing to do with the Democrats' opposition to vouchers. I
152
guess Republicans alone of all our citizens are in--
153
154
155
McConnell: Maybe
156
there were already opposed to that.
157
158
159
Shields: No,
160
politicians are impervious and indifferent to large [amounts of money]--
161
162
163
Al Hunt: It's a
164
wonderful, clean system.
165
166
167
Margaret Carlson:
168
What a great country.
169
170
171
172
173
174