Mars to Humanity: Get Over Yourself
So far, popular reaction
to NASA's announcement that its scientists have discovered evidence of life in
a meteorite from Mars has been pretty positive. Only a few cynics have accused
the space agency of a ploy for more funding. But that may change as the
implications sink in. Last week's announcement is the biggest insult to the
human species in almost 500 years, step two in a three-step process that will
leave humanity totally humbled.
Ptolemy (second century)
was the first and boldest in a long succession of spin doctors for the primacy
of human beings. The whole universe, he postulated, rotated around us, with the
Earth sitting at the center of heaven itself. Any marketing consultant will
tell you that positioning is everything, and center-of-the-universe is hard to
beat.
A
Polish astronomer named Copernicus (1473-1543) rudely pointed out: Sorry
earthlings, we spin around the sun, not vice versa. This might have made
Copernicus unpopular, if he hadn't had the good sense to die the day his book
went to press. His follower, Galileo Galilei (1564-1642), built a telescope and
used it to piss in the soup even more. The sun, it seemed, has spots on it. Far
from being the perfect furnace of heaven, it has a face covered with celestial
zits. The moon is an uneven and pockmarked rock, and Jupiter upstages Earth by
having multiple moons. The sky went from being a perfect clockwork centered on
Earth to a fairly shabby neighborhood in which we were a minor resident.
This revelation was disquieting enough that the authorities
of the time sought the only rational solution--they decided to burn Galileo
alive if he didn't recant. Eventually Galileo did sign a decree saying that the
Earth sat at the center of the universe, while muttering, "Eppur si moeve"
("But it still moves") under his breath. Giordano Bruno, a sort of
16 th -century Carl Sagan, popularized these concepts without
repenting, saying, among other things, that "innumerable suns exist.
Innumerable earths revolve around those suns. Living beings inhabit these
worlds." A soundbite like that would have gotten Bruno his 15 minutes of TV
celebrity if he'd been around last week. But this was 400 years ago, so they
roasted him to death instead.
Bruno's
crime, like Galileo's, was to undermine the uniqueness of our planet, and by
doing so, to threaten the intellectual security of the religious dictatorships
of his time. People get cranky when you burst their bubble. Over time, advances
in astronomy have relentlessly reinforced the utter insignificance of Earth on
a celestial scale. Fortunately, political and religious leaders stopped
barbecuing astronomers for saying so, turning their spits with human-rights
activists instead.
But the hubris that makes us insist on a special role for
humans and Earth didn't disappear: It just found other bases. Among the
sciences, biology became the last refuge, for within its realm, Earth was still
special. Life was the unique and sacred phenomenon of which we humans were the
crowning glory. Consciously or not, mainstream opinion in biology--until last
week--orbited around the essential mystery of life on Earth just as surely as
the Ptolemaic view was lodged in the firmament. Only a few brave scientists
violated the taboo and speculated on life beyond Earth.
Most visions of
extraterrestrial life are actually steeped in human hubris. The fictional
extraterrestrials of Star
Trek or a hundred other space operas
are less alien than many of my neighbors. And funny, the ones running the place
are mostly WASPish men. A galaxy full of these folks is no stranger than a
Kiwanis club meeting: We have met the aliens, and they are us! Darker visions
of life beyond earth support human supremacy in another way. After all, even
the most monstrous and advanced alien foe can be vanquished by the likes of
Sigourney Weaver or Will Smith. For that matter, those hapless aliens can't
stay ahead of the doughty X-Files team without a conspiratorial
collaboration with that least effective of all entities, the U.S.
government.
Alien
stories that are claimed as true are no better. Why Earth would be such a
fascinating place for UFOs to visit is left unexplained. I mean, really:
Roswell, N.M.? Inevitably, the UFO stories climax in the ultimate tribute to
human ego. The aliens, it seems, have traveled umpteen billion miles so they
can abduct us from our beds and have sex with us. I'm told that once you try a
human, you never go back.
The NASA discovery suggests that life is probably a pretty
ordinary phenomenon that occurs anyplace you give it half a chance. Earth isn't
special. The alien life forms aren't special either. Instead of highly logical
humanoids with pointy ears or other endearing characteristics, they seem to be
a lot like simple bacteria. Should they invade, Will Smith can wipe them out
with some Listerine.
When there's only one
example of anything, its very uniqueness makes it special. Life on Earth was
special because it was the only life we knew. In this case however, the dogma
being shattered is based fundamentally on ignorance. Nobody knew whether there
was life on Mars because, oddly enough, nobody had looked until now. The whole
field of biology has rested precariously on a single data point--life on Earth.
Last week, we got a second data point.
Research over the last 20 years has changed the scientific view of life.
Researchers have found fossils, similar to those in the meteorite, in some of
the oldest rock on Earth. There was evidence that life was present just as soon
as the planet cooled and solidified. If that happened so quickly on Earth, why
not on Mars, whose early stages of development were quite similar to
Earth's?
A > succession of discoveries has taught us about archeabacteria, very
ancient and primitive single-cell organisms that live in the places you'd least
expect anything to call home. They inhabit the near-boiling water of geysers in
Yellowstone, and the even hotter water in volcanic vents on the ocean floor.
They are in oil wells and the crevices of basalt deep within the earth. A basic
tenet of biology used to be that the energy requirements of all living things
are met ultimately by the sun--mainly through plants converting sunlight into
more easily digestible forms of energy. The archeabacteria live far from any
contact with the sun, subsisting instead on heat from the center of the Earth,
nourished only by sulfur and other elements leaching from the rock. Some
scientists have estimated that the sum of these tiny organisms spread deep
within the Earth outweighs all the forms of life on the surface combined.
Perhaps we surface-dwelling life forms are the exceptions--bizarre mutations of
the normally deep-dwelling archeabacteria that populate the interiors of
planets all over the galaxy. If the discovery is what it appears to be, the
inside of Mars may still be full of them.
Looking ahead, we can anticipate the next frontier of
hubris. Sure, there may be life on other planets--if you call that life. But
humans are still the only intelligent life--right? The wagons will
circle to defend this last bastion of human conceit. Technology is only just
beginning to let us search the skies for the telltale clues another
civilization might offer. People who speculate on the odds can be either upbeat
or quite discouraging depending on what ax they have to grind. But as with life
on Mars, until you get a chance to take a look, how confident can you be one
way or another? Maybe it's true that we're the only members of the big brain
club, but I'll lay my bets with ET.
There's a consolation
prize for humanity, though. The steady erosion of our claim to a special place
in the universe has come with a steady growth in our maturity as a species.
What greater intellectual puzzle can there be than dealing with nature on its
own terms? Wallowing in a solipsistic world dictated by our own hubris isn't
much of a challenge in comparison. Mankind is not special by virtue of our
address in the universe, or what spins around us, or because life originated
here. Slowly, but surely, we've been compelled to renounce the comfort of these
beliefs. Our true distinction is the intellectual journey that brought us to
this understanding.
