Book a Demo!
CoCalc Logo Icon
StoreFeaturesDocsShareSupportNewsAboutPoliciesSign UpSign In
Download
29547 views
1
2
3
4
5
6
Jesuitical vs. Talmudic
7
8
An exchange occurred not
9
long ago in California's Sacramento Superior and Municipal Courts. As a lawyer
10
attempted to excuse his client's behavior with a convoluted explanation, Judge
11
James Ford interrupted acidly with the comment, "That's just ... that's just
12
too Jesuitical for words." The colloquy continued as follows:
13
14
15
16
17
Lawyer: "Pardon me?"
18
19
20
21
22
23
Judge: "It's too Jesuitical . You probably didn't go to a
24
Jesuit school."
25
26
27
28
29
30
Lawyer: "Certainly didn't. I am of the Jewish faith."
31
32
33
34
35
36
Judge: "Then it's too Talmudic for words."
37
38
39
One can almost hear the appreciative chuckles from the
40
spectators' gallery at this bit of repartee--the overreactive,
41
tension-dispelling response that very mild witticisms tend to produce in solemn
42
venues. And yet someone should have risen to say, "Objection!" It is common to
43
regard "Jesuitical" and "Talmudic" as synonymous, but this does an injustice to
44
both words.
45
46
47
"Talmudic" originally signified nothing more than "of or pertaining to the
48
Talmud" ( Oxford English Dictionary ), the Talmud being the postbiblical
49
Rabbinic code of Jewish laws and interpretations that is the source of
50
authority in Orthodox Judaism. "Jesuitical" originally signified "of or
51
pertaining to the Jesuits; belonging to the Society of Jesus; Jesuit"
52
( OED , again), the Jesuits being the Roman Catholic clerical order
53
founded by Ignatius Loyola in 1534 as an intellectual bulwark against the
54
Reformation. Whatever else may be said about them, both "Talmudic" and
55
"Jesuitical" carry connotations of great learning and meticulous attention to
56
argument. Where they diverge is in motivation.
57
58
Very early, owing in part to English Protestant
59
propagandists, the word "Jesuitical" came to characterize a form of argument
60
designed less to seek the truth than to make a case, a form of argument that
61
was aggressive and clever but perhaps not always sincere--indeed, one that was
62
at times cunningly equivocal or downright deceitful. Aside from pure
63
anti-Jesuit animus, this nuance probably arose from the work of some
64
17th-century Jesuit theologians who imperfectly employed a method known as
65
"casuistry" in resolving questions of moral theology--an approach that gave the
66
broadest possible leeway to individual behavior. This form of justification,
67
which became known as "laxism," may explain why Jesuit priests were the
68
confessors of choice among Europe's Catholic aristocracy.
69
70
To characterize a lie as
71
an "economy of truth" would be a Jesuitical formulation. To say that one had
72
smoked marijuana but did not inhale would be a Jesuitical distinction. (Bill
73
Clinton received his undergraduate degree from Georgetown University, a Jesuit
74
school.) William Safire argues that "Jesuitical" has by now developed a sense
75
devoid of any overtones of prevarication: "subtle, intricate, moralistic
76
reasoning, informed by a rigorous logic" is his definition. I am not as
77
sanguine as Safire, and believe that using the word will always carry some
78
slight risk: It may be wielded as a slur and received as a compliment, or vice
79
versa.
80
81
"Talmudic" carries none of
82
this baggage. The Talmud, with its commentaries on the Torah and its
83
commentaries on the commentaries (the process goes on and on) cannot be faulted
84
for using guile to arrive at a congenial "truth." But the word has its own
85
negative connotations. Talmudic scholarship is famous for the tortuous and
86
painstaking manner in which truth is pursued and established--if it can be
87
established at all. It is assumed by Talmudic scholars that the language of the
88
Talmud is precise, and that each word is therefore of surpassing significance.
89
As a result, even infinitesimal details are treated with the utmost
90
seriousness. Also, while Talmudic scholarship is sometimes aimed at practical
91
affairs (for instance, civil and criminal law, dietary laws, the status of
92
women), it also considers issues that have no practical application at all, and
93
sometimes delves into matters that may seem utterly fanciful.
94
95
In his
96
book The Essential Talmud , rabbi and scholar Adin Steinsaltz recounts a
97
famous absurdist parody: A rabbi asked his disciple why the letter peh (p
98
99
100
101
102
103