Real-time collaboration for Jupyter Notebooks, Linux Terminals, LaTeX, VS Code, R IDE, and more,
all in one place.
Real-time collaboration for Jupyter Notebooks, Linux Terminals, LaTeX, VS Code, R IDE, and more,
all in one place.
| Download
Try doing some basic maths questions in the Lean Theorem Prover. Functions, real numbers, equivalence relations and groups. Click on README.md and then on "Open in CoCalc with one click".
Project: Xena
Views: 18536License: APACHE
/- Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved. Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE. Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel Banach spaces, i.e., complete vector spaces. This file contains the Banach open mapping theorem, i.e., the fact that a bijective bounded linear map between Banach spaces has a bounded inverse. -/ import topology.metric_space.baire analysis.normed_space.bounded_linear_maps open function metric set filter finset open_locale classical topological_space variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜] {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [complete_space E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] {F : Type*} [normed_group F] [complete_space F] [normed_space 𝕜 F] {f : E → F} include 𝕜 set_option class.instance_max_depth 70 /-- The Banach open mapping theorem: if a bounded linear map between Banach spaces is onto, then any point has a preimage with controlled norm. -/ theorem exists_preimage_norm_le (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) (surj : surjective f) : ∃C, 0 < C ∧ ∀y, ∃x, f x = y ∧ ∥x∥ ≤ C * ∥y∥ := begin have lin := hf.to_is_linear_map, haveI : nonempty F := ⟨0⟩, /- First step of the proof (using completeness of `F`): by Baire's theorem, there exists a ball in E whose image closure has nonempty interior. Rescaling everything, it follows that any `y ∈ F` is arbitrarily well approached by images of elements of norm at most `C * ∥y∥`. For further use, we will only need such an element whose image is within distance ∥y∥/2 of y, to apply an iterative process. -/ have A : (⋃n:ℕ, closure (f '' (ball 0 n))) = univ, { refine subset.antisymm (subset_univ _) (λy hy, _), rcases surj y with ⟨x, hx⟩, rcases exists_nat_gt (∥x∥) with ⟨n, hn⟩, refine mem_Union.2 ⟨n, subset_closure _⟩, refine (mem_image _ _ _).2 ⟨x, ⟨_, hx⟩⟩, rwa [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm, sub_zero] }, have : ∃(n:ℕ) y ε, 0 < ε ∧ ball y ε ⊆ closure (f '' (ball 0 n)) := nonempty_interior_of_Union_of_closed (λn, is_closed_closure) A, have : ∃C, 0 ≤ C ∧ ∀y, ∃x, dist (f x) y ≤ (1/2) * ∥y∥ ∧ ∥x∥ ≤ C * ∥y∥, { rcases this with ⟨n, a, ε, ⟨εpos, H⟩⟩, rcases normed_field.exists_one_lt_norm 𝕜 with ⟨c, hc⟩, refine ⟨(ε/2)⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * 2 * n, _, λy, _⟩, { refine mul_nonneg (mul_nonneg (mul_nonneg _ (norm_nonneg _)) (by norm_num)) _, refine inv_nonneg.2 (div_nonneg' (le_of_lt εpos) (by norm_num)), exact nat.cast_nonneg n }, { by_cases hy : y = 0, { use 0, simp [hy, lin.map_zero] }, { rcases rescale_to_shell hc (half_pos εpos) hy with ⟨d, hd, ydle, leyd, dinv⟩, let δ := ∥d∥ * ∥y∥/4, have δpos : 0 < δ := div_pos (mul_pos ((norm_pos_iff _).2 hd) ((norm_pos_iff _).2 hy)) (by norm_num), have : a + d • y ∈ ball a ε, by simp [dist_eq_norm, lt_of_le_of_lt ydle (half_lt_self εpos)], rcases mem_closure_iff'.1 (H this) _ δpos with ⟨z₁, z₁im, h₁⟩, rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 z₁im with ⟨x₁, hx₁, xz₁⟩, rw ← xz₁ at h₁, rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm, sub_zero] at hx₁, have : a ∈ ball a ε, by { simp, exact εpos }, rcases mem_closure_iff'.1 (H this) _ δpos with ⟨z₂, z₂im, h₂⟩, rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 z₂im with ⟨x₂, hx₂, xz₂⟩, rw ← xz₂ at h₂, rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm, sub_zero] at hx₂, let x := x₁ - x₂, have I : ∥f x - d • y∥ ≤ 2 * δ := calc ∥f x - d • y∥ = ∥f x₁ - (a + d • y) - (f x₂ - a)∥ : by { congr' 1, simp only [x, lin.map_sub], abel } ... ≤ ∥f x₁ - (a + d • y)∥ + ∥f x₂ - a∥ : norm_sub_le _ _ ... ≤ δ + δ : begin apply add_le_add, { rw [← dist_eq_norm, dist_comm], exact le_of_lt h₁ }, { rw [← dist_eq_norm, dist_comm], exact le_of_lt h₂ } end ... = 2 * δ : (two_mul _).symm, have J : ∥f (d⁻¹ • x) - y∥ ≤ 1/2 * ∥y∥ := calc ∥f (d⁻¹ • x) - y∥ = ∥d⁻¹ • f x - (d⁻¹ * d) • y∥ : by rwa [lin.smul, inv_mul_cancel, one_smul] ... = ∥d⁻¹ • (f x - d • y)∥ : by rw [mul_smul, smul_sub] ... = ∥d∥⁻¹ * ∥f x - d • y∥ : by rw [norm_smul, normed_field.norm_inv] ... ≤ ∥d∥⁻¹ * (2 * δ) : begin apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left I, rw inv_nonneg, exact norm_nonneg _ end ... = (∥d∥⁻¹ * ∥d∥) * ∥y∥ /2 : by { simp only [δ], ring } ... = ∥y∥/2 : by { rw [inv_mul_cancel, one_mul], simp [norm_eq_zero, hd] } ... = (1/2) * ∥y∥ : by ring, rw ← dist_eq_norm at J, have 𝕜 : ∥d⁻¹ • x∥ ≤ (ε / 2)⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * 2 * ↑n * ∥y∥ := calc ∥d⁻¹ • x∥ = ∥d∥⁻¹ * ∥x₁ - x₂∥ : by rw [norm_smul, normed_field.norm_inv] ... ≤ ((ε / 2)⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * ∥y∥) * (n + n) : begin refine mul_le_mul dinv _ (norm_nonneg _) _, { exact le_trans (norm_sub_le _ _) (add_le_add (le_of_lt hx₁) (le_of_lt hx₂)) }, { apply mul_nonneg (mul_nonneg _ (norm_nonneg _)) (norm_nonneg _), exact inv_nonneg.2 (le_of_lt (half_pos εpos)) } end ... = (ε / 2)⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * 2 * ↑n * ∥y∥ : by ring, exact ⟨d⁻¹ • x, J, 𝕜⟩ } } }, rcases this with ⟨C, C0, hC⟩, /- Second step of the proof: starting from `y`, we want an exact preimage of `y`. Let `g y` be the approximate preimage of `y` given by the first step, and `h y = y - f(g y)` the part that has no preimage yet. We will iterate this process, taking the approximate preimage of `h y`, leaving only `h^2 y` without preimage yet, and so on. Let `u n` be the approximate preimage of `h^n y`. Then `u` is a converging series, and by design the sum of the series is a preimage of `y`. This uses completeness of `E`. -/ choose g hg using hC, let h := λy, y - f (g y), have hle : ∀y, ∥h y∥ ≤ (1/2) * ∥y∥, { assume y, rw [← dist_eq_norm, dist_comm], exact (hg y).1 }, refine ⟨2 * C + 1, by linarith, λy, _⟩, have hnle : ∀n:ℕ, ∥(h^[n]) y∥ ≤ (1/2)^n * ∥y∥, { assume n, induction n with n IH, { simp only [one_div_eq_inv, nat.nat_zero_eq_zero, one_mul, nat.iterate_zero, pow_zero] }, { rw [nat.iterate_succ'], apply le_trans (hle _) _, rw [pow_succ, mul_assoc], apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left IH, norm_num } }, let u := λn, g((h^[n]) y), have ule : ∀n, ∥u n∥ ≤ (1/2)^n * (C * ∥y∥), { assume n, apply le_trans (hg _).2 _, calc C * ∥(h^[n]) y∥ ≤ C * ((1/2)^n * ∥y∥) : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hnle n) C0 ... = (1 / 2) ^ n * (C * ∥y∥) : by ring }, have sNu : summable (λn, ∥u n∥), { refine summable_of_nonneg_of_le (λn, norm_nonneg _) ule _, exact summable_mul_right _ (summable_geometric (by norm_num) (by norm_num)) }, have su : summable u := summable_of_summable_norm sNu, let x := tsum u, have x_ineq : ∥x∥ ≤ (2 * C + 1) * ∥y∥ := calc ∥x∥ ≤ (∑n, ∥u n∥) : norm_tsum_le_tsum_norm sNu ... ≤ (∑n, (1/2)^n * (C * ∥y∥)) : tsum_le_tsum ule sNu (summable_mul_right _ summable_geometric_two) ... = (∑n, (1/2)^n) * (C * ∥y∥) : by { rw tsum_mul_right, exact summable_geometric_two } ... = 2 * (C * ∥y∥) : by rw tsum_geometric_two ... = 2 * C * ∥y∥ + 0 : by rw [add_zero, mul_assoc] ... ≤ 2 * C * ∥y∥ + ∥y∥ : add_le_add (le_refl _) (norm_nonneg _) ... = (2 * C + 1) * ∥y∥ : by ring, have fsumeq : ∀n:ℕ, f((range n).sum u) = y - (h^[n]) y, { assume n, induction n with n IH, { simp [lin.map_zero] }, { rw [sum_range_succ, lin.add, IH, nat.iterate_succ'], simp [u, h] } }, have : tendsto (λn, (range n).sum u) at_top (𝓝 x) := tendsto_sum_nat_of_has_sum (has_sum_tsum su), have L₁ : tendsto (λn, f((range n).sum u)) at_top (𝓝 (f x)) := tendsto.comp (hf.continuous.tendsto _) this, simp only [fsumeq] at L₁, have L₂ : tendsto (λn, y - (h^[n]) y) at_top (𝓝 (y - 0)), { refine tendsto_const_nhds.sub _, rw tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero, simp only [sub_zero], refine squeeze_zero (λ_, norm_nonneg _) hnle _, have : 0 = 0 * ∥y∥, by rw zero_mul, rw this, refine tendsto.mul _ tendsto_const_nhds, exact tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 (by norm_num) (by norm_num) }, have feq : f x = y - 0, { apply tendsto_nhds_unique _ L₁ L₂, simp }, rw sub_zero at feq, exact ⟨x, feq, x_ineq⟩ end /-- The Banach open mapping theorem: a surjective bounded linear map between Banach spaces is open. -/ theorem open_mapping (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) (surj : surjective f) : is_open_map f := begin assume s hs, have lin := hf.to_is_linear_map, rcases exists_preimage_norm_le hf surj with ⟨C, Cpos, hC⟩, refine is_open_iff.2 (λy yfs, _), rcases mem_image_iff_bex.1 yfs with ⟨x, xs, fxy⟩, rcases is_open_iff.1 hs x xs with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩, refine ⟨ε/C, div_pos εpos Cpos, λz hz, _⟩, rcases hC (z-y) with ⟨w, wim, wnorm⟩, have : f (x + w) = z, by { rw [lin.add, wim, fxy], abel }, rw ← this, have : x + w ∈ ball x ε := calc dist (x+w) x = ∥w∥ : by { rw dist_eq_norm, simp } ... ≤ C * ∥z - y∥ : wnorm ... < C * (ε/C) : begin apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left _ Cpos, rwa [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm] at hz, end ... = ε : mul_div_cancel' _ (ne_of_gt Cpos), exact set.mem_image_of_mem _ (hε this) end /-- If a bounded linear map is a bijection, then its inverse is also a bounded linear map. -/ theorem linear_equiv.is_bounded_inv (e : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] F) (h : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 e.to_fun) : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 e.inv_fun := { bound := begin have : surjective e.to_fun := (equiv.bijective e.to_equiv).2, rcases exists_preimage_norm_le h this with ⟨M, Mpos, hM⟩, refine ⟨M, Mpos, λy, _⟩, rcases hM y with ⟨x, hx, xnorm⟩, have : x = e.inv_fun y, by { rw ← hx, exact (e.symm_apply_apply _).symm }, rwa ← this end, ..e.symm } /-- Associating to a linear equivalence between Banach spaces a continuous linear equivalence when the direct map is continuous, thanks to the Banach open mapping theorem that ensures that the inverse map is also continuous. -/ def linear_equiv.to_continuous_linear_equiv_of_continuous (e : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] F) (h : continuous e) : E ≃L[𝕜] F := { continuous_to_fun := h, continuous_inv_fun := let f : E →L[𝕜] F := { cont := h, ..e} in (e.is_bounded_inv f.is_bounded_linear_map).continuous, ..e }