Real-time collaboration for Jupyter Notebooks, Linux Terminals, LaTeX, VS Code, R IDE, and more,
all in one place.
Real-time collaboration for Jupyter Notebooks, Linux Terminals, LaTeX, VS Code, R IDE, and more,
all in one place.
| Download
Try doing some basic maths questions in the Lean Theorem Prover. Functions, real numbers, equivalence relations and groups. Click on README.md and then on "Open in CoCalc with one click".
Project: Xena
Views: 18536License: APACHE
/- Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved. Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE. Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro Theory of Cauchy filters in uniform spaces. Complete uniform spaces. Totally bounded subsets. -/ import topology.uniform_space.basic topology.bases data.set.intervals universes u v open filter topological_space lattice set classical open_locale classical variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [uniform_space α] open_locale uniformity topological_space /-- A filter `f` is Cauchy if for every entourage `r`, there exists an `s ∈ f` such that `s × s ⊆ r`. This is a generalization of Cauchy sequences, because if `a : ℕ → α` then the filter of sets containing cofinitely many of the `a n` is Cauchy iff `a` is a Cauchy sequence. -/ def cauchy (f : filter α) := f ≠ ⊥ ∧ filter.prod f f ≤ (𝓤 α) /-- A set `s` is called *complete*, if any Cauchy filter `f` such that `s ∈ f` has a limit in `s` (formally, it satisfies `f ≤ 𝓝 x` for some `x ∈ s`). -/ def is_complete (s : set α) := ∀f, cauchy f → f ≤ principal s → ∃x∈s, f ≤ 𝓝 x lemma cauchy_iff {f : filter α} : cauchy f ↔ (f ≠ ⊥ ∧ (∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃t∈f.sets, set.prod t t ⊆ s)) := and_congr iff.rfl $ forall_congr $ assume s, forall_congr $ assume hs, mem_prod_same_iff lemma cauchy_map_iff {l : filter β} {f : β → α} : cauchy (l.map f) ↔ (l ≠ ⊥ ∧ tendsto (λp:β×β, (f p.1, f p.2)) (l.prod l) (𝓤 α)) := by rw [cauchy, (≠), map_eq_bot_iff, prod_map_map_eq]; refl lemma cauchy_downwards {f g : filter α} (h_c : cauchy f) (hg : g ≠ ⊥) (h_le : g ≤ f) : cauchy g := ⟨hg, le_trans (filter.prod_mono h_le h_le) h_c.right⟩ lemma cauchy_nhds {a : α} : cauchy (𝓝 a) := ⟨nhds_ne_bot, calc filter.prod (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a) = (𝓤 α).lift (λs:set (α×α), (𝓤 α).lift' (λt:set(α×α), set.prod {y : α | (y, a) ∈ s} {y : α | (a, y) ∈ t})) : nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod ... ≤ (𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set (α×α), comp_rel s s) : le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume hs, infi_le_of_le s $ infi_le_of_le hs $ infi_le_of_le s $ infi_le_of_le hs $ principal_mono.mpr $ assume ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨(hx : (x, a) ∈ s), (hy : (a, y) ∈ s)⟩, ⟨a, hx, hy⟩ ... ≤ 𝓤 α : comp_le_uniformity⟩ lemma cauchy_pure {a : α} : cauchy (pure a) := cauchy_downwards cauchy_nhds pure_ne_bot (pure_le_nhds a) /-- The common part of the proofs of `le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp` and `sequentially_complete.le_nhds_of_seq_tendsto_nhds`: if for any entourage `s` one can choose a set `t ∈ f` of diameter `s` such that it contains a point `y` with `(x, y) ∈ s`, then `f` converges to `x`. -/ lemma le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp_aux {f : filter α} {x : α} (adhs : ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t ∈ f, (set.prod t t ⊆ s) ∧ ∃ y, (y ∈ t) ∧ (x, y) ∈ s) : f ≤ 𝓝 x := begin -- Consider a neighborhood `s` of `x` assume s hs, -- Take an entourage twice smaller than `s` rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets (mem_nhds_uniformity_iff.1 hs) with ⟨U, U_mem, hU⟩, -- Take a set `t ∈ f`, `t × t ⊆ U`, and a point `y ∈ t` such that `(x, y) ∈ U` rcases adhs U U_mem with ⟨t, t_mem, ht, y, hy, hxy⟩, apply mem_sets_of_superset t_mem, -- Given a point `z ∈ t`, we have `(x, y) ∈ U` and `(y, z) ∈ t × t ⊆ U`, hence `z ∈ s` exact (λ z hz, hU (prod_mk_mem_comp_rel hxy (ht $ mk_mem_prod hy hz)) rfl) end /-- If `x` is an adherent (cluster) point for a Cauchy filter `f`, then it is a limit point for `f`. -/ lemma le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp {f : filter α} {x : α} (hf : cauchy f) (adhs : f ⊓ 𝓝 x ≠ ⊥) : f ≤ 𝓝 x := le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp_aux begin assume s hs, -- Take `t ∈ f` such that `t × t ⊆ s`. rcases (cauchy_iff.1 hf).2 s hs with ⟨t, t_mem, ht⟩, use [t, t_mem, ht], exact (forall_sets_nonempty_iff_ne_bot.2 adhs _ (inter_mem_inf_sets t_mem (mem_nhds_left x hs))) end lemma le_nhds_iff_adhp_of_cauchy {f : filter α} {x : α} (hf : cauchy f) : f ≤ 𝓝 x ↔ f ⊓ 𝓝 x ≠ ⊥ := ⟨assume h, (inf_of_le_left h).symm ▸ hf.left, le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp hf⟩ lemma cauchy_map [uniform_space β] {f : filter α} {m : α → β} (hm : uniform_continuous m) (hf : cauchy f) : cauchy (map m f) := ⟨have f ≠ ⊥, from hf.left, by simp; assumption, calc filter.prod (map m f) (map m f) = map (λp:α×α, (m p.1, m p.2)) (filter.prod f f) : filter.prod_map_map_eq ... ≤ map (λp:α×α, (m p.1, m p.2)) (𝓤 α) : map_mono hf.right ... ≤ 𝓤 β : hm⟩ lemma cauchy_comap [uniform_space β] {f : filter β} {m : α → β} (hm : comap (λp:α×α, (m p.1, m p.2)) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α) (hf : cauchy f) (hb : comap m f ≠ ⊥) : cauchy (comap m f) := ⟨hb, calc filter.prod (comap m f) (comap m f) = comap (λp:α×α, (m p.1, m p.2)) (filter.prod f f) : filter.prod_comap_comap_eq ... ≤ comap (λp:α×α, (m p.1, m p.2)) (𝓤 β) : comap_mono hf.right ... ≤ 𝓤 α : hm⟩ /-- Cauchy sequences. Usually defined on ℕ, but often it is also useful to say that a function defined on ℝ is Cauchy at +∞ to deduce convergence. Therefore, we define it in a type class that is general enough to cover both ℕ and ℝ, which are the main motivating examples. -/ def cauchy_seq [semilattice_sup β] (u : β → α) := cauchy (at_top.map u) lemma cauchy_seq_of_tendsto_nhds [semilattice_sup β] [nonempty β] (f : β → α) {x} (hx : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 x)) : cauchy_seq f := cauchy_downwards cauchy_nhds (map_ne_bot at_top_ne_bot) hx lemma cauchy_seq_iff_prod_map [inhabited β] [semilattice_sup β] {u : β → α} : cauchy_seq u ↔ map (prod.map u u) at_top ≤ 𝓤 α := iff.trans (and_iff_right (map_ne_bot at_top_ne_bot)) (prod_map_at_top_eq u u ▸ iff.rfl) lemma cauchy_seq_of_controlled [semilattice_sup β] [inhabited β] (U : β → set (α × α)) (hU : ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ n, U n ⊆ s) {f : β → α} (hf : ∀ {N m n : β}, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → (f m, f n) ∈ U N) : cauchy_seq f := cauchy_seq_iff_prod_map.2 begin assume s hs, rw [mem_map, mem_at_top_sets], cases hU s hs with N hN, refine ⟨(N, N), λ mn hmn, _⟩, cases mn with m n, exact hN (hf hmn.1 hmn.2) end /-- A complete space is defined here using uniformities. A uniform space is complete if every Cauchy filter converges. -/ class complete_space (α : Type u) [uniform_space α] : Prop := (complete : ∀{f:filter α}, cauchy f → ∃x, f ≤ 𝓝 x) lemma complete_univ {α : Type u} [uniform_space α] [complete_space α] : is_complete (univ : set α) := begin assume f hf _, rcases complete_space.complete hf with ⟨x, hx⟩, exact ⟨x, by simp, hx⟩ end lemma cauchy_prod [uniform_space β] {f : filter α} {g : filter β} : cauchy f → cauchy g → cauchy (filter.prod f g) | ⟨f_proper, hf⟩ ⟨g_proper, hg⟩ := ⟨filter.prod_ne_bot.2 ⟨f_proper, g_proper⟩, let p_α := λp:(α×β)×(α×β), (p.1.1, p.2.1), p_β := λp:(α×β)×(α×β), (p.1.2, p.2.2) in suffices (f.prod f).comap p_α ⊓ (g.prod g).comap p_β ≤ (𝓤 α).comap p_α ⊓ (𝓤 β).comap p_β, by simpa [uniformity_prod, filter.prod, filter.comap_inf, filter.comap_comap_comp, (∘), lattice.inf_assoc, lattice.inf_comm, lattice.inf_left_comm], lattice.inf_le_inf (filter.comap_mono hf) (filter.comap_mono hg)⟩ instance complete_space.prod [uniform_space β] [complete_space α] [complete_space β] : complete_space (α × β) := { complete := λ f hf, let ⟨x1, hx1⟩ := complete_space.complete $ cauchy_map uniform_continuous_fst hf in let ⟨x2, hx2⟩ := complete_space.complete $ cauchy_map uniform_continuous_snd hf in ⟨(x1, x2), by rw [nhds_prod_eq, filter.prod_def]; from filter.le_lift (λ s hs, filter.le_lift' $ λ t ht, have H1 : prod.fst ⁻¹' s ∈ f.sets := hx1 hs, have H2 : prod.snd ⁻¹' t ∈ f.sets := hx2 ht, filter.inter_mem_sets H1 H2)⟩ } /--If `univ` is complete, the space is a complete space -/ lemma complete_space_of_is_complete_univ (h : is_complete (univ : set α)) : complete_space α := ⟨λ f hf, let ⟨x, _, hx⟩ := h f hf ((@principal_univ α).symm ▸ le_top) in ⟨x, hx⟩⟩ lemma cauchy_iff_exists_le_nhds [complete_space α] {l : filter α} (hl : l ≠ ⊥) : cauchy l ↔ (∃x, l ≤ 𝓝 x) := ⟨complete_space.complete, assume ⟨x, hx⟩, cauchy_downwards cauchy_nhds hl hx⟩ lemma cauchy_map_iff_exists_tendsto [complete_space α] {l : filter β} {f : β → α} (hl : l ≠ ⊥) : cauchy (l.map f) ↔ (∃x, tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) := cauchy_iff_exists_le_nhds (map_ne_bot hl) /-- A Cauchy sequence in a complete space converges -/ theorem cauchy_seq_tendsto_of_complete [semilattice_sup β] [complete_space α] {u : β → α} (H : cauchy_seq u) : ∃x, tendsto u at_top (𝓝 x) := complete_space.complete H /-- If `K` is a complete subset, then any cauchy sequence in `K` converges to a point in `K` -/ lemma cauchy_seq_tendsto_of_is_complete [semilattice_sup β] {K : set α} (h₁ : is_complete K) {u : β → α} (h₂ : ∀ n, u n ∈ K) (h₃ : cauchy_seq u) : ∃ v ∈ K, tendsto u at_top (𝓝 v) := h₁ _ h₃ $ le_principal_iff.2 $ mem_map_sets_iff.2 ⟨univ, univ_mem_sets, by { simp only [image_univ], rintros _ ⟨n, rfl⟩, exact h₂ n }⟩ theorem le_nhds_lim_of_cauchy {α} [uniform_space α] [complete_space α] [inhabited α] {f : filter α} (hf : cauchy f) : f ≤ 𝓝 (lim f) := lim_spec (complete_space.complete hf) lemma is_complete_of_is_closed [complete_space α] {s : set α} (h : is_closed s) : is_complete s := λ f cf fs, let ⟨x, hx⟩ := complete_space.complete cf in ⟨x, is_closed_iff_nhds.mp h x (ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot cf.left (le_inf hx fs)), hx⟩ /-- A set `s` is totally bounded if for every entourage `d` there is a finite set of points `t` such that every element of `s` is `d`-near to some element of `t`. -/ def totally_bounded (s : set α) : Prop := ∀d ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃t : set α, finite t ∧ s ⊆ (⋃y∈t, {x | (x,y) ∈ d}) theorem totally_bounded_iff_subset {s : set α} : totally_bounded s ↔ ∀d ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃t ⊆ s, finite t ∧ s ⊆ (⋃y∈t, {x | (x,y) ∈ d}) := ⟨λ H d hd, begin rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity hd with ⟨r, hr, rs, rd⟩, rcases H r hr with ⟨k, fk, ks⟩, let u := {y ∈ k | ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ (x, y) ∈ r}, let f : u → α := λ x, classical.some x.2.2, have : ∀ x : u, f x ∈ s ∧ (f x, x.1) ∈ r := λ x, classical.some_spec x.2.2, refine ⟨range f, _, _, _⟩, { exact range_subset_iff.2 (λ x, (this x).1) }, { have : finite u := finite_subset fk (λ x h, h.1), exact ⟨@set.fintype_range _ _ _ _ this.fintype⟩ }, { intros x xs, have := ks xs, simp at this, rcases this with ⟨y, hy, xy⟩, let z : coe_sort u := ⟨y, hy, x, xs, xy⟩, exact mem_bUnion_iff.2 ⟨_, ⟨z, rfl⟩, rd $ mem_comp_rel.2 ⟨_, xy, rs (this z).2⟩⟩ } end, λ H d hd, let ⟨t, _, ht⟩ := H d hd in ⟨t, ht⟩⟩ lemma totally_bounded_subset {s₁ s₂ : set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h : totally_bounded s₂) : totally_bounded s₁ := assume d hd, let ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := h d hd in ⟨t, ht₁, subset.trans hs ht₂⟩ lemma totally_bounded_empty : totally_bounded (∅ : set α) := λ d hd, ⟨∅, finite_empty, empty_subset _⟩ lemma totally_bounded_closure {s : set α} (h : totally_bounded s) : totally_bounded (closure s) := assume t ht, let ⟨t', ht', hct', htt'⟩ := mem_uniformity_is_closed ht, ⟨c, hcf, hc⟩ := h t' ht' in ⟨c, hcf, calc closure s ⊆ closure (⋃ (y : α) (H : y ∈ c), {x : α | (x, y) ∈ t'}) : closure_mono hc ... = _ : closure_eq_of_is_closed $ is_closed_bUnion hcf $ assume i hi, continuous_iff_is_closed.mp (continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const) _ hct' ... ⊆ _ : bUnion_subset $ assume i hi, subset.trans (assume x, @htt' (x, i)) (subset_bUnion_of_mem hi)⟩ lemma totally_bounded_image [uniform_space β] {f : α → β} {s : set α} (hf : uniform_continuous f) (hs : totally_bounded s) : totally_bounded (f '' s) := assume t ht, have {p:α×α | (f p.1, f p.2) ∈ t} ∈ 𝓤 α, from hf ht, let ⟨c, hfc, hct⟩ := hs _ this in ⟨f '' c, finite_image f hfc, begin simp [image_subset_iff], simp [subset_def] at hct, intros x hx, simp [-mem_image], exact let ⟨i, hi, ht⟩ := hct x hx in ⟨f i, mem_image_of_mem f hi, ht⟩ end⟩ lemma cauchy_of_totally_bounded_of_ultrafilter {s : set α} {f : filter α} (hs : totally_bounded s) (hf : is_ultrafilter f) (h : f ≤ principal s) : cauchy f := ⟨hf.left, assume t ht, let ⟨t', ht'₁, ht'_symm, ht'_t⟩ := comp_symm_of_uniformity ht in let ⟨i, hi, hs_union⟩ := hs t' ht'₁ in have (⋃y∈i, {x | (x,y) ∈ t'}) ∈ f.sets, from mem_sets_of_superset (le_principal_iff.mp h) hs_union, have ∃y∈i, {x | (x,y) ∈ t'} ∈ f.sets, from mem_of_finite_Union_ultrafilter hf hi this, let ⟨y, hy, hif⟩ := this in have set.prod {x | (x,y) ∈ t'} {x | (x,y) ∈ t'} ⊆ comp_rel t' t', from assume ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ ⟨(h₁ : (x₁, y) ∈ t'), (h₂ : (x₂, y) ∈ t')⟩, ⟨y, h₁, ht'_symm h₂⟩, (filter.prod f f).sets_of_superset (prod_mem_prod hif hif) (subset.trans this ht'_t)⟩ lemma totally_bounded_iff_filter {s : set α} : totally_bounded s ↔ (∀f, f ≠ ⊥ → f ≤ principal s → ∃c ≤ f, cauchy c) := ⟨assume : totally_bounded s, assume f hf hs, ⟨ultrafilter_of f, ultrafilter_of_le, cauchy_of_totally_bounded_of_ultrafilter this (ultrafilter_ultrafilter_of hf) (le_trans ultrafilter_of_le hs)⟩, assume h : ∀f, f ≠ ⊥ → f ≤ principal s → ∃c ≤ f, cauchy c, assume d hd, classical.by_contradiction $ assume hs, have hd_cover : ∀{t:set α}, finite t → ¬ s ⊆ (⋃y∈t, {x | (x,y) ∈ d}), by simpa using hs, let f := ⨅t:{t : set α // finite t}, principal (s \ (⋃y∈t.val, {x | (x,y) ∈ d})), ⟨a, ha⟩ := (@ne_empty_iff_nonempty α s).1 (assume h, hd_cover finite_empty $ h.symm ▸ empty_subset _) in have f ≠ ⊥, from infi_ne_bot_of_directed ⟨a⟩ (assume ⟨t₁, ht₁⟩ ⟨t₂, ht₂⟩, ⟨⟨t₁ ∪ t₂, finite_union ht₁ ht₂⟩, principal_mono.mpr $ diff_subset_diff_right $ Union_subset_Union $ assume t, Union_subset_Union_const or.inl, principal_mono.mpr $ diff_subset_diff_right $ Union_subset_Union $ assume t, Union_subset_Union_const or.inr⟩) (assume ⟨t, ht⟩, by simp [diff_eq_empty]; exact hd_cover ht), have f ≤ principal s, from infi_le_of_le ⟨∅, finite_empty⟩ $ by simp; exact subset.refl s, let ⟨c, (hc₁ : c ≤ f), (hc₂ : cauchy c)⟩ := h f ‹f ≠ ⊥› this, ⟨m, hm, (hmd : set.prod m m ⊆ d)⟩ := (@mem_prod_same_iff α c d).mp $ hc₂.right hd in have c ≤ principal s, from le_trans ‹c ≤ f› this, have m ∩ s ∈ c.sets, from inter_mem_sets hm $ le_principal_iff.mp this, let ⟨y, hym, hys⟩ := nonempty_of_mem_sets hc₂.left this in let ys := (⋃y'∈({y}:set α), {x | (x, y') ∈ d}) in have m ⊆ ys, from assume y' hy', show y' ∈ (⋃y'∈({y}:set α), {x | (x, y') ∈ d}), by simp; exact @hmd (y', y) ⟨hy', hym⟩, have c ≤ principal (s - ys), from le_trans hc₁ $ infi_le_of_le ⟨{y}, finite_singleton _⟩ $ le_refl _, have (s - ys) ∩ (m ∩ s) ∈ c.sets, from inter_mem_sets (le_principal_iff.mp this) ‹m ∩ s ∈ c.sets›, have ∅ ∈ c.sets, from c.sets_of_superset this $ assume x ⟨⟨hxs, hxys⟩, hxm, _⟩, hxys $ ‹m ⊆ ys› hxm, hc₂.left $ empty_in_sets_eq_bot.mp this⟩ lemma totally_bounded_iff_ultrafilter {s : set α} : totally_bounded s ↔ (∀f, is_ultrafilter f → f ≤ principal s → cauchy f) := ⟨assume hs f, cauchy_of_totally_bounded_of_ultrafilter hs, assume h, totally_bounded_iff_filter.mpr $ assume f hf hfs, have cauchy (ultrafilter_of f), from h (ultrafilter_of f) (ultrafilter_ultrafilter_of hf) (le_trans ultrafilter_of_le hfs), ⟨ultrafilter_of f, ultrafilter_of_le, this⟩⟩ lemma compact_iff_totally_bounded_complete {s : set α} : compact s ↔ totally_bounded s ∧ is_complete s := ⟨λ hs, ⟨totally_bounded_iff_ultrafilter.2 (λ f hf1 hf2, let ⟨x, xs, fx⟩ := compact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds.1 hs f hf1 hf2 in cauchy_downwards (cauchy_nhds) (hf1.1) fx), λ f fc fs, let ⟨a, as, fa⟩ := hs f fc.1 fs in ⟨a, as, le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp fc fa⟩⟩, λ ⟨ht, hc⟩, compact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds.2 (λf hf hfs, hc _ (totally_bounded_iff_ultrafilter.1 ht _ hf hfs) hfs)⟩ @[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority] instance complete_of_compact {α : Type u} [uniform_space α] [compact_space α] : complete_space α := ⟨λf hf, by simpa [principal_univ] using (compact_iff_totally_bounded_complete.1 compact_univ).2 f hf⟩ lemma compact_of_totally_bounded_is_closed [complete_space α] {s : set α} (ht : totally_bounded s) (hc : is_closed s) : compact s := (@compact_iff_totally_bounded_complete α _ s).2 ⟨ht, is_complete_of_is_closed hc⟩ /-! ### Sequentially complete space In this section we prove that a uniform space is complete provided that it is sequentially complete (i.e., any Cauchy sequence converges) and its uniformity filter admits a countable generating set. In particular, this applies to (e)metric spaces, see the files `topology/metric_space/emetric_space` and `topology/metric_space/basic`. More precisely, we assume that there is a sequence of entourages `U_n` such that any other entourage includes one of `U_n`. Then any Cauchy filter `f` generates a decreasing sequence of sets `s_n ∈ f` such that `s_n × s_n ⊆ U_n`. Choose a sequence `x_n∈s_n`. It is easy to show that this is a Cauchy sequence. If this sequence converges to some `a`, then `f ≤ 𝓝 a`. -/ namespace sequentially_complete variables {f : filter α} (hf : cauchy f) {U : ℕ → set (α × α)} (U_mem : ∀ n, U n ∈ 𝓤 α) (U_le : ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ n, U n ⊆ s) open set finset noncomputable theory /-- An auxiliary sequence of sets approximating a Cauchy filter. -/ def set_seq_aux (n : ℕ) : {s : set α // ∃ (_ : s ∈ f), s.prod s ⊆ U n } := indefinite_description _ $ (cauchy_iff.1 hf).2 (U n) (U_mem n) /-- Given a Cauchy filter `f` and a sequence `U` of entourages, `set_seq` provides a sequence of monotonically decreasing sets `s n ∈ f` such that `(s n).prod (s n) ⊆ U`. -/ def set_seq (n : ℕ) : set α := ⋂ m ∈ Iic n, (set_seq_aux hf U_mem m).val lemma set_seq_mem (n : ℕ) : set_seq hf U_mem n ∈ f := Inter_mem_sets (finite_le_nat n) (λ m _, (set_seq_aux hf U_mem m).2.fst) lemma set_seq_mono ⦃m n : ℕ⦄ (h : m ≤ n) : set_seq hf U_mem n ⊆ set_seq hf U_mem m := bInter_subset_bInter_left (λ k hk, le_trans hk h) lemma set_seq_sub_aux (n : ℕ) : set_seq hf U_mem n ⊆ set_seq_aux hf U_mem n := bInter_subset_of_mem right_mem_Iic lemma set_seq_prod_subset {N m n} (hm : N ≤ m) (hn : N ≤ n) : (set_seq hf U_mem m).prod (set_seq hf U_mem n) ⊆ U N := begin assume p hp, refine (set_seq_aux hf U_mem N).2.snd ⟨_, _⟩; apply set_seq_sub_aux, exact set_seq_mono hf U_mem hm hp.1, exact set_seq_mono hf U_mem hn hp.2 end /-- A sequence of points such that `seq n ∈ set_seq n`. Here `set_seq` is a monotonically decreasing sequence of sets `set_seq n ∈ f` with diameters controlled by a given sequence of entourages. -/ def seq (n : ℕ) : α := some $ nonempty_of_mem_sets hf.1 (set_seq_mem hf U_mem n) lemma seq_mem (n : ℕ) : seq hf U_mem n ∈ set_seq hf U_mem n := some_spec $ nonempty_of_mem_sets hf.1 (set_seq_mem hf U_mem n) lemma seq_pair_mem ⦃N m n : ℕ⦄ (hm : N ≤ m) (hn : N ≤ n) : (seq hf U_mem m, seq hf U_mem n) ∈ U N := set_seq_prod_subset hf U_mem hm hn ⟨seq_mem hf U_mem m, seq_mem hf U_mem n⟩ include U_le theorem seq_is_cauchy_seq : cauchy_seq $ seq hf U_mem := cauchy_seq_of_controlled U U_le $ seq_pair_mem hf U_mem /-- If the sequence `sequentially_complete.seq` converges to `a`, then `f ≤ 𝓝 a`. -/ theorem le_nhds_of_seq_tendsto_nhds ⦃a : α⦄ (ha : tendsto (seq hf U_mem) at_top (𝓝 a)) : f ≤ 𝓝 a := le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp_aux begin assume s hs, rcases U_le s hs with ⟨m, hm⟩, rcases (tendsto_at_top' _ _).1 ha _ (mem_nhds_left a (U_mem m)) with ⟨n, hn⟩, refine ⟨set_seq hf U_mem (max m n), set_seq_mem hf U_mem _, _, seq hf U_mem (max m n), seq_mem hf U_mem _, _⟩, { have := le_max_left m n, exact set.subset.trans (set_seq_prod_subset hf U_mem this this) hm }, { exact hm (hn _ $ le_max_right m n) } end end sequentially_complete namespace uniform_space open sequentially_complete variables (H : has_countable_basis (𝓤 α)) include H /-- A uniform space is complete provided that (a) its uniformity filter has a countable basis; (b) any sequence satisfying a "controlled" version of the Cauchy condition converges. -/ theorem complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences (U : ℕ → set (α × α)) (U_mem : ∀ n, U n ∈ 𝓤 α) (HU : ∀ u : ℕ → α, (∀ N m n, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → (u m, u n) ∈ U N) → ∃ a, tendsto u at_top (𝓝 a)) : complete_space α := begin rcases (𝓤 α).has_countable_basis_iff_mono_seq'.1 H with ⟨U', U'_mono, hU'⟩, have Hmem : ∀ n, U n ∩ U' n ∈ 𝓤 α, from λ n, inter_mem_sets (U_mem n) (hU'.2 ⟨n, subset.refl _⟩), refine ⟨λ f hf, (HU (seq hf Hmem) (λ N m n hm hn, _)).imp $ le_nhds_of_seq_tendsto_nhds _ _ (λ s hs, _)⟩, { rcases (hU'.1 hs) with ⟨N, hN⟩, exact ⟨N, subset.trans (inter_subset_right _ _) hN⟩ }, { exact inter_subset_left _ _ (seq_pair_mem hf Hmem hm hn) } end /-- A sequentially complete uniform space with a countable basis of the uniformity filter is complete. -/ theorem complete_of_cauchy_seq_tendsto (H' : ∀ u : ℕ → α, cauchy_seq u → ∃a, tendsto u at_top (𝓝 a)) : complete_space α := let ⟨U', U'_mono, hU'⟩ := (𝓤 α).has_countable_basis_iff_mono_seq'.1 H in complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences H U' (λ n, hU'.2 ⟨n, subset.refl _⟩) (λ u hu, H' u $ cauchy_seq_of_controlled U' (λ s hs, hU'.1 hs) hu) protected lemma first_countable_topology : first_countable_topology α := ⟨λ a, by { rw nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, exact H.comap (prod.mk a) }⟩ end uniform_space