Real-time collaboration for Jupyter Notebooks, Linux Terminals, LaTeX, VS Code, R IDE, and more,
all in one place.
Real-time collaboration for Jupyter Notebooks, Linux Terminals, LaTeX, VS Code, R IDE, and more,
all in one place.
Conjugacy in the Logistic Family
The case of .
Pick two parameters in the interval . We will find an explicit topological conjugacy between the two maps restricted to . (It is not hard to extend the conjugacy outside the interval, but this will be enough to understand how to build such conjugacies.)
Below we plot with the diagonal over the interval .
Here is the plot of :
Recall that these maps have fixed points at zero and at .
Check that is fixed by :
We'll use for the corresponding fixed point of :
Notice that restricts to a map and this map is a homeomorphism.
Furthermore, we have for . Therefore, all orbits in converge monotonically to .
We choose any point to construct a fundamental domain for . This means that for every point there is a unique such that To do this we must take .
Now we find a fundamental domain for the restriction .
The first stage of the topological conjugacy
We can now produce a topological conjugacy , which should satisfy .
To do this, we first select a homeomorphism between the fundamental domains. For simplicity, we'll just use an affine linear map (though any orientation-preserving homeomorphism will work):
Let's check that this does what we want:
The topological conjugacy must satisfy and .
For , we will be defining where is the integer such that . Computing this and is not too difficult. Basically, if , then we continue applying until the point lies in , and if we continue applying until the point lies in .
For this second possibility, we need to an inverse of . There really are two inverses, and sage can actually compute them:
This will be our left and right inverses:
Here is a sanity check:
Let's do the same for :
Now lets turn our attention to computing and . Let's suppose that . Let's pick a particular example and try it.
The idea is to repeat applying until our point becomes bigger than or equal to . At that moment it will lie in .
Now we need to check if is still less than .
We have to repeat it again:
Now we check again:
To be sure, lets see if :
To perform these actions automatically, we can use a while loop:
We remark that we are doing exact arithmetic. If our input is floating point, we will get more readable answers:
Here is a function implementing the full topological conjugacy :
Let's see what looks like:
Let's check the conjugacy equation:
Note that is continuous but not differentiable (despite the apparent smoothness!):
The second stage:
The point is special because it is the critical point. Concretely, is the only point with only one preimage. The same holds for . So, must be sent to by a conjugacy.
Observe that . This is because for , we have and .
We set and :
Now we define a homeomorphism between the fundamental domains: :
We now extend the previous conjugacy to a conjugacy :
Here we plot h3:
Here we graphically check the conjugacy equation:
We look at the derivative for fun:
An interesting thing to look at is what is happening for near the fixed point . Recall that we showed the conjugacy can not be a homeomorphism in a neighborhood of . From the above graph, it looks like , which means that cannot have a differentiable inverse. Here is a graph of in a small neighborhood of :
The third stage:
Now we extend to the full interval .
Suppose that . We'll want out conjugacy to send to some point . Observe that and . Our map defined above satisfies We claim that if we define then we'll get a conjugacy. To see this fix an . Then and so and since we have Thus on .
Graphically checking the conjugacy: