Book a Demo!
CoCalc Logo Icon
StoreFeaturesDocsShareSupportNewsAboutPoliciesSign UpSign In
Download
29548 views
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
how do you feel about uh drug testing Bob
14
15
16
well i guess uh i really don't have a lot of contact with uh with the business world i'm self employed work in a one person office
17
18
19
okay
20
21
22
and so my my my my contacts with the with the drug testing possibilities are pretty limited uh
23
24
25
um how do you feel about people that are subjected to having to have the drug testing done
26
27
28
well i
29
i i you know i understand why companies can in some cases would feel a need
30
uh i have some reservations about it because i i do believe that i believe in individual rights
31
32
33
um-hum
34
35
36
and and i think that uh that that does at least borderline on an invasion of privacy or you know or violation of you know personal rights
37
38
39
oh uh what recourse do you think a company would have then if they had people using drugs and were jeopardizing the company structure
40
41
42
yeah well i guess i'd i'm uh i'm not sure that uh
43
44
45
uh you know you'd have to prove somehow
46
show that there's a reason for you know for suspecting that person
47
as you know as being a drug user or you know whatever and i mean you wouldn't uh you wouldn't you're not allowed a company's not allowed anymore to give uh uh
48
what is it uh
49
50
51
protection
52
53
54
the no the the test uh now i've drawn a blank
55
56
57
um you mean uh uh the test to oh the polygraph
58
59
60
polygraph test
61
yeah you're not allowed to use polygraph test in pre screening you know for employees anymore uh so you know you don't have any any proof or any way to check on a person as to their honesty
62
63
64
um-hum um-hum um-hum
65
66
67
68
69
uh
70
the only way that you you know the only alternative you have if you suspect suspect a person is uh is stealing from you is to get evidence
71
72
73
correct
74
75
76
uh to that effect you know and i kind of feel like uh
77
78
79
um-hum
80
81
82
drug testing should fall into that into that same category or potentially anyway that if you suspect it that you should have some kind of proof not
83
84
85
do you
86
87
88
not come up with a method to to have the employee furnish the furnish the proof against themselves you know in effect you know that's that's kind of uh
89
90
91
um-hum um-hum
92
93
94
of defeating some of the purposes i think of the Constitution which you know which says you know you don't have to give
95
self incriminating evidence course we're talking about you know criminal cases in that in that case but i still i think it still fits you know the same uh
96
97
98
um-hum
99
right
100
101
102
somewhat anyway the the same area
103
104
105
i guess uh they feel because drug use is so widespread
106
and there's not any um
107
deviation so to speak
108
between an executive and a lay person as far as drug use goes
109
110
111
um-hum
112
113
114
and um i feel and just looking at it on the surface
115
um
116
that they wouldn't have much of a choice um
117
in picking somebody uh sometimes drugs don't uh the results of taking drugs don't come out until after something tragic has happened
118
and in order to uh resolve it before it happens that they feel that this is most the most direct way and
119
painless way of uh
120
scanning their uh employees
121
i know that in our company i have not known a woman to have the drug test yet
122
123
124
well
125
126
127
but of course the men i guess it's more popular and i don't know if this is true if it's more popular between men drug use than it is women because i know there are a lot of women that do use drugs
128
129
130
um-hum yeah there's not uh from my from my own personal uh knowledge not experience but knowledge
131
132
133
but
134
um-hum um-hum
135
136
137
uh there are i would say there are as many women drug users
138
139
140
as there are men uh-huh
141
142
143
as there are men uh in most you know most of the cases that i know of you know
144
from
145
personal conversations uh
146
147
148
i don't know anybody
149
uh in even a random um friendship that uses drugs
150
151
152
yeah well i've known people in the in the past that have you know that uh and in in almost all of those cases it was you know husband and wife or boyfriend girlfriend or
153
154
155
um-hum
156
um-hum
157
158
159
you know that kind of a situation
160
161
162
a casual user of drugs or
163
164
165
do what a casual user uh yeah pretty much uh right social social users say uh
166
167
168
uh-huh
169
just to try and see what it was like and then
170
yeah
171
172
173
and and and in in you know in some cases it would be
174
uh a group of friends that you know that i would know about that you know i'm not a drug user i have not ever been and will not ever be but i you know i've known people that have talked about it you know and uh
175
176
177
that were experiencing different things
178
um-hum
179
sure
180
um-hum
181
182
183
and it was you know it was couples and groups and
184
you know male and female and
185
186
187
um-hum
188
189
190
you know it was not limited to
191
192
193
194
195
well i i would be um i don't have any desire to but i would be awfully fearful because of all the uh
196
um illicit drugs that are around and the methods by which they're made
197
198
199
right
200
201
202
and some of them are very deadly and it's kind of playing Russian Roulette with drugs
203
204
205
right
206
yeah so but yeah i i understand the you know the idea i'm i'm all in favor of getting drugs out of the you know out of the the system completely
207
208
209
so it
210
um-hum
211
well it doesn't bring anything but chaos
212
213
214
yeah right but uh you know i i think that uh i think that the companies that that have started
215
the the the non voluntary drug testing and and Texas Instruments in particular or is you know is one that i know of anyway
216
217
218
219
220
um-hum
221
um-hum
222
223
224
they uh
225
i think they're asking for for the Constitution to be interpreted to say hey you can't do this it's you know it's a violation from my point of view it's a violation of you know of of a person
226
227
228
do you think a rule against a certain uh um
229
substance is in violation of their civil rights
230
231
232
uh not a rule against it but a a a non voluntary testing for it
233
234
235
um-hum
236
237
238
is i think that's you know it's it's like you're telling if they're telling a person you don't have any alternative but to uh accept uh accept this test go through this testing
239
240
241
i wonder if uh now in their applications when they hire people i know it wasn't in the application that i filled out years ago but
242
if now they um are very up front with saying we are going to test you for drugs and if it's then knowledgeable to the uh applicant
243
244
245
well yeah
246
you know in TI's under TI's current policy uh new hire new employees are tested
247
248
249
um-hum
250
um-hum
251
252
253
and you know so it's it is a part of the you know it's a part of the test a part of the part of the employment employing procedure now is is to test
254
255
256
so they know that it's not a
257
right um-hum
258
259
260
and and there's there's no problem with
261
you know with pre employment testing that i guess that's a little a little unusual that they can test test for drugs but they can't test for honesty
262
and uh
263
you know so that's uh but that is you know that is a a
264
265
266
we live in a in
267
268
269
270