Book a Demo!
CoCalc Logo Icon
StoreFeaturesDocsShareSupportNewsAboutPoliciesSign UpSign In
Download
29547 views
1
2
3
4
5
6
Views You Can Use!
7
8
The newsweeklies are choosing up sides in Flytrap. Time is Monica's
9
Magazine. Ms. Lewinsky's increasingly creepy mouthpiece, William Ginsburg,
10
cooperates with Time reporters--witness this week's long, generally
11
sympathetic piece on "Monica's World," which portrays Ginsburg as her
12
"surrogate dad" and describes, presumably on some authority, the ex-interns own
13
thoughts (e.g., "You didn't do anything wrong!"). But Ginsburg has frosted
14
Newsweek , which is perceived to be in Linda Tripp's camp. A short
15
critical Newsweek piece on Ginsburg and his "appetite for the high life"
16
notes that he "declined ... to talk to Newsweek ".... Newsweek ,
17
meanwhile, is Paula's Magazine. Indeed you could plot the array of competing
18
newsmagazine allegiances:
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Newsweek
27
28
Linda Tripp
29
Paula Jones
30
Kathleen Willey
31
Vernon Jordan
32
33
34
35
36
37
Time
38
39
Monica Lewinsky
40
Bill Clinton
41
Julie Steele
42
Vernon Jordan
43
44
45
46
47
48
There's nothing necessarily sinister about these match-ups. It's a natural
49
ecological phenomenon. If one mag has locked up the sources in one camp--the
50
journalists' supply of food, as it were--it's only sensible for a competing mag
51
to quickly secure the competing food source. Readers should simply be aware, as
52
they weigh what they are told, that each magazine has an incentive to
53
please--or at least not totally piss off--its primary allies....
54
55
Which is not to say that Newsweek still won't try to throw Ginsburg a
56
few bones in the hope of gaining his cooperation, or that Time won't
57
skillfully let him make a fool of himself. In "Monica's World," for example,
58
Ginsburg says of his client: "I was there at the beginning. I kissed that
59
girl's inner thighs when she was six days old--I said 'Look at those little
60
polkas '." What's that all about? Chatterbox is getting Freudian
61
overload ... Ginsburg is also heard boasting "I truly am the avuncular Mr.
62
Ginsburg," and he condescendingly predicts that "the American people will let"
63
President Clinton "limp to the end of his term." Mighty avuncular of you, Mr.
64
G!
65
66
67
WOULD YOU BELIEVE HE LUSTED IN HIS HEART?:
68
69
Slate's
70
editors are among those who have been privileged to receive the White House
71
trial-balloon explanation of Clinton's "complicated" friendship with Monica
72
Lewinsky. You know, he may have had an ... er, avuncular , implicitly
73
sexual and probably inappropriate relationship that was, alas, never actually,
74
physically consummated ... Call it the "modified limited hangout" strategy
75
...
76
77
78
CHATTERDUMP: Oliver North, running for president? Yes! declare
79
Republican rumormongers ... And people say Chatterbox has no right-wing
80
sources! ... Why is Kenneth Starr wasting time waging a big fight with Clinton
81
aide Bruce Lindsey over whether Lindsey's testimony is protected by "executive
82
privilege"? Does anybody really think that even if Lindsey is required to
83
answer every question, he'll actually incriminate Clinton? At best, he'll say
84
"I don't recall"... A joke that produces consistent hilarity at Washington
85
parties: Why did Clinton have to get blowjobs from Monica Lewinsky? Because Sid
86
Blumenthal hadn't joined his staff yet! ... But seriously, Chatterbox wants to
87
defend "Grassy Knoll" Blumenthal against those who trash him for giving advice
88
to his friends the Clintons while he was still a writer for The New
89
Yorker . Blumenthal was writing for an opinionated magazine, after all, if
90
not for a New Republic -style "magazine of opinion." He gave his opinions
91
to his readers. He gave his opinions to the Clintons. Where's the conflict? If
92
the Clintons call to get Chatterbox's advice, they'll get it!... The problem,
93
in principle, would come if Blumenthal was giving different opinions to the
94
Clintons and to his readers (something he's not accused of) or if Blumenthal's
95
readers were somehow misled into thinking they were getting a dispassionate
96
perspective. But any New Yorker subscriber who didn't realize that
97
Blumenthal was massively ego-invested in the Clintons' success just wasn't
98
paying attention ... Chatterbox hopes this stout defense won't stop Blumenthal
99
from ordering the Clinton critic-intimidation team to investigate Chatterbox's
100
private life. What fun! What publicity! ... For the record, Chatterbox has
101
never done anything avuncular, though it tried once in college ...
102
103
104
105
106
107