Book a Demo!
CoCalc Logo Icon
StoreFeaturesDocsShareSupportNewsAboutPoliciesSign UpSign In
Download
29547 views
1
2
3
4
5
6
The Sweet Problem of Success
7
8
9
10
The pundits made the budget
11
surplus Issue 1. Liberals said Washington should spend it and conservatives
12
said it should be given back to the taxpayers. E.J. Dionne's proposal on NBC's
13
Meet the Press that the surplus could engender a "substantive" political
14
debate about "what we want government to do" was truncheoned by fellow panelist
15
Robert Novak. Surpluses always lead to talk of "tax cuts or higher spending,"
16
said Novak, with spending inevitably winning. David Broder ( Meet the
17
Press ) criticized the "element of fantasy" in the spend-it-or-give-it-back
18
discussion given the unfunded Social Security and Medicare liabilities looming
19
early in the next century. On Fox News Sunday , Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del.,
20
seconded Broder: The surplus allows us to "set the system straight 30 years
21
out" with "no political costs" to Democrats or Republicans who resist the calls
22
for increased spending and tax cuts.
23
24
"Isn't it
25
nice," said a radiant Bob Schieffer (CBS's Face the Nation ), that the
26
weekend's biggest problem was how to handle the extraordinary good news of a
27
budget surplus? Not nice at all, said the Five Big Thinkers on PBS's
28
NewsHour With Jim Lehrer (Michael Beschloss, Doris Kearns Goodwin,
29
Haynes Johnson, Roger Rosenblatt, and Richard Rodriguez). The Big Thinkers
30
found only the dark lining in our silver cloud. Future generations will judge
31
us, said Beschloss, on how we used "this tranquil moment" to address our
32
problems. Goodwin said that as long as the public's hunger for a national
33
purpose and community goes unfed by Washington, they will turn to tabloid
34
tales--Diana's death, the nanny case, the murder of Gianni Versace--for meaning
35
and civic involvement.
36
37
Embracing this theme, Dionne instructed President Clinton
38
to "stop all this public pondering" over his "legacy" and actually harness our
39
current good fortune to some glowing idea. But the liberal commentarians
40
themselves had little to offer in the way of imaginative suggestions, falling
41
back on the usual ideas about expanding the federal role in education,
42
rebuilding the infrastructure, and providing health care to the uninsured.
43
Meanwhile, the Sunday New York Times reported that the states--with an
44
eye on the November elections--are already celebrating the New Golden Age with
45
tax cuts.
46
47
A snarl of
48
other news issues vied for the No. 2 slot, but all failed to reach critical
49
mass because 1) the pundits failed to advance the debate (the International
50
Monetary Fund bailout of South Korea), 2) the pundits had nothing weighty to
51
say (Chief Justice William Rehnquist's rebuke of the Senate for failing to fill
52
federal judgeships; Clinton's plan to extend Medicare to 62-year-olds), or 3)
53
because a political talk show is an awkward venue for the discussion (the
54
"Unabomber" prosecution of Ted Kaczynski; the death of Michael Kennedy). With
55
the issue-generating machine of Congress out of session, the commentariat
56
proved that it's as bad at the vision thing as it accuses Clinton of being.
57
58
59
60
Punditus Interruptus, Week 3: Robert
61
Novak was a gentleman this week on Capital Gang , letting Al Hunt finish
62
all his sentences without interruption. Hunt cut Novak off once, evening the
63
running score at 2-2.
64
65
66
David Brinkley Returns to
67
This Week : As pitchman for Archer Daniels Midland, the
68
government-subsidy swilling, political-talk-show sponsoring agribiz giant.
69
70
"Pundit Central" is
71
sufficiently cynical about TV pundits that the transformation of one of them
72
into a corporate shill should set off no alarms. But it does, perhaps because
73
four decades of sanctimonious droning by Brinkley as a network news anchor and
74
then as the founding pundit of This Week created the illusion that he
75
was a principled journalist who couldn't be bought by a price-fixing
76
corporation. As Brinkley's first ADM commercial unspooled on ABC's This
77
Week , he spoke obliquely about having accepted a new position, deliberately
78
fostering the notion that he was returning to ABC as some sort of superpundit.
79
Then he explained that in coming weeks he'd be talking about nutrition and
80
agriculture in the service of ADM. Brinkley's appearance as a pitchman in the
81
middle of his old program was so disconcerting that when This Week
82
resumed, co-host Cokie Roberts attempted to salvage the show's good name by
83
reiterating Brinkley's disclaimer. The move backfired, unintentionally
84
reminding viewers that the big difference between ADM and ABC is that ADM is
85
just a couple of letters farther down the alphabet.
86
87
88
89
--Jack
90
Shafer
91
92
93
94
95
96
97