Book a Demo!
CoCalc Logo Icon
StoreFeaturesDocsShareSupportNewsAboutPoliciesSign UpSign In
Download
29547 views
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Drawing upon her rich
10
experience of life, Prudence (Prudie to her friends) responds to questions
11
about manners, personal relations, politics, and other subjects. Please send
12
your questions for publication to [email protected]. Queries should not exceed 200 words in
13
length. Please indicate how you wish your letter to be signed, preferably
14
including your location.
15
16
17
18
19
Dear
20
Prudence,
21
22
23
24
25
The
26
words sex, impotence, and Viagra are certainly very public today, therefore I
27
feel comfortable writing this. I am a male in my 60s. Five years ago I had a
28
radical prostate operation that left me impotent. During this time my wife used
29
other men to satisfy her sexual needs. I recently obtained some Viagra, and it
30
works for me. Self-satisfaction was required to prove this, as my wife has
31
chosen not to participate. I now face the following problem: My sexual desires
32
have been restored, but to act on them will require my involvement with women
33
other than my wife, who does not see things this way. I think I should do as
34
she did. Do you have an opinion on this?
35
36
37
38
--Ed in
39
Washington
40
41
42
Dear
43
Ed,
44
45
Prudie is fanning herself.
46
Let's see if she has understood this: When you were impotent your wife was on
47
the town, as it were. Now that you are operative she is not a willing partner
48
but has decreed that you may not see other women.
49
50
Prudie
51
certainly does have an opinion. It is that your wife is a four-door,
52
gold-plated harridan who most likely is using you as either a bed and breakfast
53
or a bank. Her stepping out then forbidding you to do so, even though
54
she is an unwilling sex partner, makes her sound like a perfect candidate for
55
the single life. Prudie suggests you take your newly operative self to a
56
divorce lawyer and after that find a nice woman who genuinely cares about
57
you.
58
59
--Prudie, potently
60
61
62
63
Dear
64
Prudence,
65
66
67
68
69
Please help me. I am 18
70
years old and face a serious problem. I am addicted to thinking about sex.
71
Every time I do something--watch television, play tennis, swim, take a
72
bath--all I can think about is sex. I am even distracted from studying. I open
73
the book, read a little, then whoosh, all these thoughts about having sex start
74
pouring in from everywhere.
75
76
77
78
To make matters worse, I
79
have never had a girlfriend. Actually, I don't even want one, because I am not
80
very open and friendly toward girls. Thus, I have never even touched a girl,
81
much less kissed one. I am not gay. Second, I am Pakistani-American, which
82
means that I belong to a culture in which the only way to have sex is to get
83
married, which I don't think I will be doing until I am 28. So I will remain a
84
virgin until then.
85
86
87
88
Now you
89
have the whole story. Please advise me how I could overcome this addiction--and
90
please don't advise me to get a girlfriend or get married early, because that
91
is out of the question. Please don't print my name because I want
92
93
94
95
--Extreme
96
Privacy
97
98
99
Dear
100
Extreme,
101
102
Prudie will not advise you to
103
get a girlfriend, but rather, a therapist. You can accomplish this either
104
through your university health service or getting recommendations from friends.
105
Since you 1) have never gone out with a girl and 2) basically think you don't
106
like them, Prudie does not know how you are going to turn your feelings around
107
at the magic and preordained age of 28. As for your obsessive and unbidden
108
thoughts about sex, they make it clear you need a professional's counsel.
109
110
You are
111
fixated on an activity that you feel is verboten but which, in fact, is
112
normal. But do not feel that your wheels are coming off. You are, after all,
113
only 18, and beginning to tackle the problem will surely ease the situation. As
114
a stopgap measure, you might try to make friends with a few girls so they will
115
not seem like such alien and forbidden creatures.
116
117
--Prudie, certainly
118
119
120
121
Dear
122
Prudence,
123
124
125
126
127
128
Whether the Department of Justice thinks it is legal or not, do you think
129
Microsoft is being rude by installing the browser without asking? Or just the
130
opposite: Are they being polite by offering people another option without
131
having to be told? Like giving a person cream for his coffee and letting him
132
decide whether or not to put it in.
133
134
135
136
--Southern
137
Courtesy
138
139
140
Dear
141
South,
142
143
Prudie,
144
for no particular reason, is quite fond of Microsoft and, perforce, their
145
browser. And she very much likes your analogy. From now on, Prudie will think
146
of the Microsoft browser as the cream in one's coffee. Following this
147
continuum, how could you think someone rude who is trying to enhance your
148
computer's "flavor"?
149
150
--Prudie, tastefully
151
152
153
154
Dear
155
Prudie,
156
157
158
159
160
I must admit I was
161
surprised by your response to the person who helped a friend and co-worker draft
162
a letter to the co-worker's neighbors. The letter writer had urged the playing
163
of the "race card," suggesting that the reason the friend's neighbors were
164
complaining so frequently about his behavior was because the friend was black.
165
The letter writer asked you whether you thought playing the race card was
166
appropriate. Expecting you to reply "No," I was most surprised to read your
167
advice to the contrary.
168
169
170
171
In my
172
opinion, raising race as the motivation behind the neighbors' complaints, in
173
the absence of evidence to support the charge, is quite reckless. Even if we
174
accept the friend's protestations that he does nothing to offend, we still have
175
no basis for charging that they are acting out of racist hatred. It could be
176
that they have ultrasensitive hearing or that they are obnoxious or nosy.
177
Perhaps the neighbors are simply bored busybodies with nothing better to do
178
than complain about every little thing that annoys them. Charging that the
179
neighbors are racist, let alone--gasp!--urging the letter writer to get the
180
American Civil Liberties Union or the Anti-Defamation League involved, is very
181
serious business. Based on the information the letter writer provided, there is
182
no reason to conclude that the neighbors are racist.
183
184
185
186
--Hopefully
187
optimistic,Stephen J. Konig
188
189
190
191
Dear
192
S.K.,
193
194
195
Prudie
196
does not agree with you that there is no basis to conclude that the neighbors
197
are racist, having found a number of indicia to the contrary. As Prudie's hero
198
Henry David Thoreau observed, "Some circumstantial evidence is very strong, as
199
when you find a trout in the milk."
200
201
--Prudie, confidently
202
203
204
205
206
207