White Weddings
Last week, the Alabama Senate voted to repeal the
state's constitutional prohibition against interracial marriage, 32 years after
the Supreme Court struck down Virginia's similar ban. Hadn't these archaic laws
gone out with Bull Connor? I asked myself as I read the news account. And
haven't we been hearing that America has rediscovered the melting pot, that in
another generation or two we'll all be "cablinasian," like Tiger Woods?
I talked to the
measure's main sponsor, state Rep. Alvin Holmes, a 24-year statehouse veteran
who has been trying to overturn the ban for decades. "The last time I tried was
about three years ago," said Holmes. "It didn't get out of committee." Holmes
credits his success to the last election, in which a bevy of Democrats were
swept into office.
Holmes wasn't just tidying up the legal code. In parts of
rural Alabama, he said, probate judges still refuse to issue marriage licenses
to interracial couples. Holmes explained that some of his Alabama colleagues
opposed his measure because they willfully refused to accept that the federal
government had the power to override state law--an ideology of states' rights
that goes way beyond Newt Gingrich to John Calhoun.
When you think about it,
it makes sense that some Alabamians found it hard to jettison overnight a
300-year-old custom. Laws against interracial marriage--and the taboos against
black-white sex that they codify--have been the central weapon in the
oppression of African-Americans since the dawn of slavery. President Abraham
Lincoln's detractors charged him in the 1864 presidential campaign with
promoting the mongrelization of the races (that's where the coinage
"miscegenation," which now sounds racist, comes from). Enemies of the
20 th -century civil rights movement predicted that the repeal of Jim
Crow laws would, as one Alabama state senator put it, "open the bedroom doors
of our white women to black men." Fears of black sexuality have been
responsible for some of the most notorious incidents of anti-black violence and
persecution, from the Scottsboro Boys to Emmett Till.
Intermarriage bans arose in the late 1600s, when tobacco
planters in Virginia needed to shore up their new institution of slavery. In
previous decades, before slavery took hold, interracial sex was more prevalent
than at any other time in American history. White and black laborers lived and
worked side by side and naturally became intimate. Even interracial marriage,
though uncommon, was allowed. But as race slavery replaced servitude as the
South's labor force, interracial sex threatened to blur the distinctions
between white and black--and thus between free and slave. Virginia began
categorizing a child as free or slave according to the mother's status (which
was easier to determine than the father's), and so in 1691 the assembly passed
a law to make sure that women didn't bear mixed-race children. The law banned
"negroes, mulatto's and Indians intermarrying with English, or other white
women, [and] their unlawfull accompanying with one another." Since the society
was heavily male, the prohibition on unions between white women and nonwhite
men also lessened the white men's competition for mates. (In contrast, sex
between male slave owners and their female slaves--which often meant rape--was
common. It typically met with light punishment, if any at all.)
If fears of interracial
sex underlay bans on interracial marriage, it was marriage that became the
greater threat. Men might rape black women or keep them as concubines, but to
marry them would confer legal equality. Thus, over the course of the
18 th century all Southern states--and many Northern ones--outlawed
all marriages between blacks and whites. Up through the Civil War, only two
states, Pennsylvania in 1780 and Massachusetts in 1843--hotbeds of abolitionist
activity--repealed their bans.
The end of slavery should have made things better. It
didn't. In the South, the federal government initially forced the removal of
the bans in several states. But when federal troops pulled out, the bans
returned, along with a whole complex of new discriminatory laws known as Jim
Crow. In the West, 13 states passed new laws against interracial marriage, many
of them targeting white-Asian unions along with white-black ones. Only in the
North did laws against intermarriage draw real fire, coming off the books in
Maine, Michigan, Ohio, and Rhode Island.
Still, even in the most
enlightened areas, mixed-race couples faced enormous social stigma. Clerks
refused to issue marriage licenses to mixed couples, and ministers often
wouldn't marry them. Couples that did marry faced harassment from employers and
neighbors. In 1944, Gunnar Myrdal, in An American Dilemma , noted that
"even a liberal-minded Northerner of cosmopolitan culture will, in nine cases
out of ten, express a definite feeling against" interracial marriage. It was,
he said, a "consecrated taboo" that "fixed" the boundary between the races.
That changed slowly with the civil right movement, which
reshaped the nation's consciousness. In 1967, an interracial married couple
named Richard and Mildred Loving brought to the Supreme Court a suit against
Virginia, claiming the right to live there. The court sided with them
unanimously, decreeing the ban unconstitutional under the 14 th
Amendment. The fortuitously named Loving decision took its place in law
books, but not necessarily in practice. Where no one had the wherewithal to
stand up for it--say, in rural Alabama-- Loving was flouted.
Precisely as white racists feared, desegregation
encouraged interracial unions. Blacks and whites began to meet and date,
especially on college campuses, which started admitting African-Americans in
larger numbers in the '60s and '70s. The next generation saw a surge in
intermarriage. In 1963, 0.7 percent of blacks married someone of another race.
By 1994, the figure had reached 12.1 percent. The 1960 census recorded 51,000
black-white marriages. Today there are more than 300,000. Attitudes changed
too. In 1958, 4 percent of white Americans approved of interracial marriages.
In 1994, it was 45 percent. And younger generations are vastly more tolerant
than their elders, suggesting these numbers will climb.
Of course, it's hard not to also see the glass as
half--or, more precisely, 55 percent--empty. All these numbers may be climbing,
but they remain low. What's more, the white-black marriage rate lags
significantly behind rates of white intermarriage with other, nonblack races.
Among 25- to 34-year-olds, 52 percent of Native Americans and 40 percent of
Asians married outside their race, while only 6 percent of blacks did so. The
racism that kept Alabama's constitution unchanged has hardly been eradicated.
Whether these habits will change on their own, with the maturation of a more
tolerant generation, or whether full social acceptance of black Americans will
require a concerted governmental effort, is unknowable. In the meantime, we can
take only meager pride in achieving a society in which interracial marriage is
safe, legal and, alas, rare.
