Real-time collaboration for Jupyter Notebooks, Linux Terminals, LaTeX, VS Code, R IDE, and more,
all in one place. Commercial Alternative to JupyterHub.
Real-time collaboration for Jupyter Notebooks, Linux Terminals, LaTeX, VS Code, R IDE, and more,
all in one place. Commercial Alternative to JupyterHub.
Path: blob/main/16Manifold_Ext_Der.ipynb
Views: 333
16. Exterior derivative
This notebook is part of the Introduction to manifolds in SageMath by Andrzej Chrzeszczyk (Jan Kochanowski University of Kielce, Poland).
If are local coordinates on a smooth manifold , then from (14.9) we know that for any differential -form on
The exterior derivative of can be defined locally by
ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \label at position 278: …, \end{matrix} \̲l̲a̲b̲e̲l̲{}\tag{16.1} \e…( denotes the differential of the scalar function ).
Example 16.1
Take a 1-form and compute its exterior derivative.
Use the method exterior_derivative()
to compute the result:
Let us apply the definition (16.1) for comparison:
Note that for example (since )
and analogously for the remaining terms (in there is no need of reordering the terms).
Example 16.2
Consider now a 2-form and its exterior differential.
The exterior derivative:
In this case for each differential only one term of the form (no summation) gives a nonzero contribution to the final result. For example, for the second term of we have
The calculations for the remaining terms are analogous.
Exterior derivative is antiderivation
for and .
Using the linearity of the operation , it is enough to prove the antiderivation property for single terms and (no summation here). From (16.1) and (13.4) we obtain
We have proved (16.2).
Exterior derivative is nilpotent
Again, it is enough to consider forms (no summation here). If with , we have
Computing the exterior derivative of we obtain In the last sum if , then if , then is symmetric in and , but is alternating in and , so the terms with pair up and cancel each other. For example
Pullback and wedge product
for and a smooth map
In fact, we have
We have checked (16.4).
Pullback and exterior derivative
Using the relation between the differential of a scalar function and the pullback (cf. (15.2)) one can check that for of the special form (no summation) and a smooth map
Due to linearity, we have proved ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \label at position 81: …\Omega^k (N ). \̲l̲a̲b̲e̲l̲{}\tag{16.5} \e…
Example 16.3
Compute the pullback of under the map .
Pullback of :
According to the remark after formula (15.6) one can check that if we replace by and by in and compute the differentials (w.r.t ) of the obtained functions, then we get
Example 16.4
Compute the pullback of under the map ,
Pullback of under :
Example 16.5
Compute for and .
Pullback
Example 16.6
Compute the pullback of under the map
Pullback :
Example 16.7
For as above compute .
:
Note that the unique component of the obtained pullback is the determinant of the Jacobian matrix
Example 16.8
For the map , defined by compute
The unique component of the pullback is the Laplace expansion of the determinant of the Jacobian matrix
Global formula for exterior differentials of 1-forms
For smooth differential 1-form and smooth vector fields on the manifold we have
Both sides of this equation are linear in the sense that if , then
therefore we only need to prove the equation for a single term .
For the left hand side of (16.6) we obtain
For the first term on the right hand side we have
and similarly
Since
Combining the obtained equalities we have
Example 16.9
Check (16.6) on selected
What's next?
Take a look at the notebook One-parameter groups of transformations.