Book a Demo!
CoCalc Logo Icon
StoreFeaturesDocsShareSupportNewsAboutPoliciesSign UpSign In
Download
29547 views
1
2
3
4
5
6
Millennium Verboten
7
8
"The
9
language of the Millennium, and the logo (until we hear otherwise), is for
10
millennium use only. ... It is very important to the overall strength and
11
infrastructure of the millennium project [for it to remain distinct] from our
12
day-to-day messages and words that we use."
13
14
15
--Memo from the White
16
House communications office to speechwriters and other officials, banning the
17
use of certain words reserved for the Hillary Clinton-led effort to welcome the
18
next century. Quoted in the New York Times, Thursday, July 30,
19
1998
20
21
22
23
24
From: [email protected]
25
26
27
To:
28
[email protected]
29
30
31
Subject:
32
Yesterday's Millennium Project Directive
33
34
D. of
35
Transportation speechwriters implored me to write in protest of yesterday's
36
directive. We're putting together congressional testimony on next year's budget
37
and having a devil of a time finding substitutes for the prohibited words.
38
Specifically, we had trouble dancing around the ban of the words "bridge,"
39
"road," and "highway." We appreciate their metaphorical importance for
40
welcoming the millennium, but could you suggest alternatives?
41
42
Rodney
43
Slater
44
45
Secretary of
46
Transportation
47
48
******
49
50
51
From:
52
[email protected]
53
54
55
To:
56
[email protected]
57
58
59
Subject: RE:
60
Yesterday's Millennium Project Directive
61
62
Anyone
63
have a synonym for "future"? It seems this word has been banned, along with all
64
references to specific dates (day, month, or year) beyond two weeks hence. The
65
standard phraseology I am leaning toward for discussing future events is "an
66
event to occur on a day subsequent to the several other days that shall proceed
67
duly in the natural course of time forward from the present moment, eventually
68
accruing into units characterized as months and, much later, years." Too
69
wordy?
70
71
L. Herbert
72
Smith III
73
74
White House
75
speechwriter
76
77
******
78
79
80
81
From: [email protected]
82
83
84
To:
85
[email protected]
86
87
88
Subject: RE:
89
Yesterday's Millennium Project Directive
90
91
And what,
92
may I ask, shall I say we are training America's young workers for? The
93
Industrial Revolution? How about 1999?
94
95
Alexis
96
Herman
97
98
Secretary of Labor
99
100
******
101
102
103
From:
104
[email protected]
105
106
107
To:
108
[email protected]; [email protected]
109
110
111
Subject: RE:
112
Yesterday's Millennium Project Directive
113
114
Alexis,
115
lay off the '99 for the moment. We hear Microsoft is trying to trademark it for
116
their next Windows release (though we're working on that).
117
118
Joel
119
Klein
120
121
Asst. attorney general for
122
antitrust
123
124
******
125
126
127
128
From: [email protected]
129
130
131
To:
132
[email protected]
133
134
135
Subject: RE:
136
Yesterday's Millennium Project Directive
137
138
The White
139
House Counsel's Office endorses Communications' effort to control rhetoric.
140
Let's use this occasion to remind ourselves of other verboten words. In
141
speeches and official communications, please refrain from using the
142
following:
143
144
"trip"
145
146
"harmonica"
147
148
"knees"
149
150
"kneepads"
151
152
"blows"
153
154
"lipstick"
155
156
"dress"
157
158
159
"stain"
160
161
Use good
162
judgment. Avoid potentially evocative terms. For an example of careful word
163
choice, take note of the Pentagon Public Affairs Office's suggestion that all
164
references to "seamen" be changed to "sailors." As always, we appreciate your
165
help.
166
167
FC
168
"Charles" Ruff
169
170
White House
171
counsel
172
173
174
175
176
177